FDT vs. CRAK

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while CRAK is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDT returned 11.17%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for CRAK. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.

Performance

FDT vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDT achieves a 23.23% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 29.26% return. Over the past 10 years, FDT has underperformed CRAK with an annualized return of 11.17%, while CRAK has yielded a comparatively higher 13.50% annualized return.

FDT

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 23.23%
• 6M: 24.33%
• 1Y: 50.01%
• 3Y*: 27.84%
• 5Y*: 12.16%
• 10Y*: 11.17%

CRAK

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -1.57%
• YTD: 29.26%
• 6M: 26.17%
• 1Y: 55.23%
• 3Y*: 20.46%
• 5Y*: 13.12%
• 10Y*: 13.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDT vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund	23.23%	52.21%	6.97%	15.03%	-19.51%	11.43%	4.29%	16.82%	-19.98%	34.42%
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	29.26%	39.11%	-15.05%	13.73%	19.10%	10.90%	-11.22%	9.15%	-10.46%	49.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FDT and CRAK is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015	0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between FDT and CRAK has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDT vs. CRAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDT	CRAK
Industrials	32.4%	4.0%
Technology	12.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.9%	-
Financial Services	9.9%	-
Basic Materials	9.4%	1.2%
Energy	7.9%	98.8%
Real Estate	5.0%	-
Utilities	4.8%	-
Communication Services	2.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	-
Healthcare	1.3%	-

Return for Risk

FDT vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDT

FDT Risk / Return Rank: 84
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

CRAK

CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 92
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDT vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDT	CRAK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	2.98	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	3.91	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.50	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.70	6.49	-2.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.01	17.24	-3.23

FDT vs. CRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDT Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the CRAK Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDT and CRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDT vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDT drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, smaller than the maximum CRAK drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDT and CRAK.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDT	CRAK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.10%	-58.80%	+12.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.41%	-8.57%	-4.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.29%	-35.61%	+21.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.80%	-35.61%	+2.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.10%	-58.80%	+12.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.37%	-6.68%	+3.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.76%	-12.48%	+1.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.54%	3.22%	+0.32%

Volatility

FDT vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) at 5.81%. This indicates that FDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDT	CRAK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.93%	5.81%	+3.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.27%	14.72%	+2.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.59%	18.66%	+0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.46%	20.67%	-2.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.62%	22.17%	-3.55%

FDT vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDT vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison

FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than CRAK's 1.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	1.56%	2.02%	5.60%	3.65%	3.08%	2.40%	2.64%	1.49%	2.42%	1.66%	3.42%	0.47%
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund	2.89%	3.27%	3.89%	4.36%	2.29%	3.80%	2.42%	2.78%	2.13%	1.57%	1.76%	1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDT and CRAK in my portfolio?

FDT and CRAK have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDT or CRAK?

FDT has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to CRAK (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDT dropped -46.10% vs CRAK's -58.80%.

Which ETF is better, FDT or CRAK?

On 10-year performance, CRAK leads with 13.50% vs 11.17% for FDT. On fees, CRAK is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, CRAK has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDT or CRAK?

Over the 10-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDT or CRAK?

CRAK is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDT or CRAK?

FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 1.56% for CRAK.

What is the main difference between FDT and CRAK?

FDT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CRAK is Energy Equities. FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDT and 0.62% for CRAK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.