FDSVX vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDSVX (Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both funds - FDSVX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, FDSVX returned 15.11%/yr vs 17.94%/yr for QQQM. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FDSVX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

FDSVX vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDSVX achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 20.73% return.

FDSVX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 7.29%
• YTD: 15.46%
• 6M: 14.91%
• 1Y: 31.25%
• 3Y*: 25.52%
• 5Y*: 15.11%
• 10Y*: 19.11%

QQQM

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 8.67%
• YTD: 20.73%
• 6M: 19.22%
• 1Y: 40.83%
• 3Y*: 28.64%
• 5Y*: 17.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDSVX vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FDSVX Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund	15.46%	15.14%	30.19%	35.63%	-24.43%	22.93%	6.42%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	20.73%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FDSVX and QQQM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020	0.95

The correlation between FDSVX and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDSVX vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDSVX

FDSVX Risk / Return Rank: 44
FDSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
FDSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
FDSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FDSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
FDSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 75
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDSVX vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDSVX	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	2.58	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	3.38	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.44	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	3.43	-0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.79	13.15	-3.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDSVX vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDSVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDSVX and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDSVX	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.97	2.58	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.81	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.84	-0.30

Drawdowns

FDSVX vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDSVX drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDSVX and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDSVX	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.34%	-35.04%	-24.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.53%	-11.96%	-0.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.42%	-22.70%	-0.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.83%	-35.04%	+5.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.75%	+0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.60%	-8.24%	-4.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	3.11%	+0.17%

Volatility

FDSVX vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) is 4.18%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that FDSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDSVX	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	4.51%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.71%	12.06%	+0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.34%	15.91%	+0.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.36%	22.23%	-1.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.59%	22.11%	-1.52%

FDSVX vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDSVX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDSVX vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

FDSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than QQQM's 0.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDSVX Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund	1.37%	1.58%	12.81%	2.55%	3.65%	13.46%	9.63%	4.28%	5.02%	4.87%	0.09%	0.17%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.42%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDSVX and QQQM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FDSVX and QQQM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FDSVX or QQQM?

QQQM has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to FDSVX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDSVX dropped -59.34% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.