FDRX vs. OOQB
FDRX (Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF) and OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDRX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Founder Led Index, while OOQB is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. FDRX is passively managed, while OOQB is actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDRX charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for OOQB.
Performance
FDRX vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDRX
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- 15.26%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OOQB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -18.43%
- 6M
- -24.99%
- 1Y
- -27.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDRX vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FDRX Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF | -4.32% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | -25.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRX and OOQB is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRX vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank
FDRX
OOQB
FDRX vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF (FDRX) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDRX | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.19 | -0.41 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
FDRX vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRX drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum OOQB drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRX and OOQB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRX | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.44% | -53.44% | +15.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.21% | -43.69% | +35.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.93% | -23.26% | +4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.11% | — |
Volatility
FDRX vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRX | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.92% | 51.57% | +6.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.92% | 58.12% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.92% | 58.12% | -0.20% |
FDRX vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRX vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison
FDRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OOQB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FDRX Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | 11.62% | 9.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRX and OOQB have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OOQB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OOQB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for FDRX.
OOQB has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.00% for FDRX.
FDRX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for FDRX and 0.75% for OOQB.
Find the right allocation for FDRX and OOQB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer