PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRV vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDRV vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRV achieves a 30.92% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return.


FDRV

1D
-0.86%
1M
11.72%
YTD
30.92%
6M
29.26%
1Y
53.50%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
10Y*

USO

1D
2.62%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
103.67%
6M
99.35%
1Y
101.55%
3Y*
29.98%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
4.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRV vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
30.92%24.32%-21.73%12.27%-44.23%7.00%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
103.67%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%-1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRV and USO is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021

0.07

The correlation between FDRV and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDRV vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRV
FDRV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FDRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDRV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FDRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDRV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRV vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDRVUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

5.01

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.66

9.42

+1.24

FDRV vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the USO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRV and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDRVUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.31

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

-0.18

+0.07

Drawdowns

FDRV vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRV drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRV and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRVUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.89%

-98.19%

+34.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.62%

-20.39%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.45%

-26.05%

-22.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.57%

-85.01%

+57.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.35%

-75.30%

+32.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

10.82%

-5.79%

Volatility

FDRV vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) is 9.01%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that FDRV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDRVUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.01%

14.87%

-5.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.49%

38.23%

-19.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.09%

44.20%

-19.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.03%

36.06%

-4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.03%

39.00%

-6.97%

FDRV vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDRV vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

FDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
1.02%1.14%0.43%0.24%0.33%0.04%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDRV and USO have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to FDRV (9.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRV dropped -63.89% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 3-year performance, USO leads with 29.98% vs 7.13% for FDRV. On fees, FDRV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FDRV has been the lower-risk option at 9.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, USO has performed better with a 29.98% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDRV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

FDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

FDRV is categorized as Transportation Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDRV and 0.86% for USO.

USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDRV and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer