PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRV vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDRV vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRV achieves a 30.92% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -39.45% return.


FDRV

1D
-0.86%
1M
11.72%
YTD
30.92%
6M
29.26%
1Y
53.50%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
10Y*

FETH

1D
-5.78%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.45%
6M
-42.77%
1Y
-31.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRV vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
30.92%24.32%-3.97%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-39.45%-11.37%-3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRV and FETH is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDRV vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRV
FDRV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FDRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDRV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FDRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDRV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRV vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDRVFETHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

-0.47

+2.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.83

-0.32

+3.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.97

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

-0.51

+3.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.66

-0.84

+11.50

FDRV vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRV and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDRVFETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

-0.47

+2.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

-0.41

+0.31

Drawdowns

FDRV vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRV drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, roughly equal to the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRV and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRVFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.89%

-64.00%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.62%

-62.95%

+47.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.57%

-62.95%

+35.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.35%

-32.73%

-9.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

37.82%

-32.79%

Volatility

FDRV vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) is 9.01%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that FDRV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDRVFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.01%

9.99%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.49%

46.01%

-27.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.09%

68.50%

-43.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.03%

72.27%

-40.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.03%

72.27%

-40.24%

FDRV vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDRV vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
1.02%1.14%0.43%0.24%0.33%0.04%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDRV and FETH have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to FDRV (9.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRV dropped -63.89% vs FETH's -64.00%.

On 1-year performance, FDRV leads with 53.50% vs -31.75% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, FDRV has been the lower-risk option at 9.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FDRV has performed better with a 53.50% return vs -31.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDRV.

FDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

FDRV is categorized as Transportation Equities, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDRV and 0.00% for FETH.

FDRV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDRV and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer