PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRV vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDRV vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRV achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -37.15% return.


FDRV

1D
0.74%
1M
-5.30%
6M
8.32%
YTD
9.64%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
-2.81%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-6.71%

FETH

1D
0.16%
1M
9.86%
6M
-19.58%
YTD
-37.15%
1Y
-46.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-26.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$89.45K$140.01K$198.80K
$29.41M$29.69M$35.01M

FDRV vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
9.64%24.32%-5.87%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-37.15%-11.37%-4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRV and FETH is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDRV vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDRV
FDRV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FDRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDRV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FDRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDRV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDRV vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDRVFETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.91

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

-0.69

+1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.98

-1.03

+4.01

FDRV vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRV Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRV and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDRV vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRV drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -67.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRV and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRVFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.89%

-67.94%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

-67.94%

+49.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.34%

-61.55%

+22.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.10%

-35.30%

-6.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.22%

45.61%

-38.39%

Volatility

FDRV vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) is 7.75%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that FDRV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDRVFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

12.28%

-4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.53%

45.60%

-23.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.71%

67.10%

-39.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.16%

71.16%

-39.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.16%

71.16%

-39.00%

FDRV vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDRV vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
1.30%1.14%0.43%0.24%0.33%0.04%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDRV and FETH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to FDRV (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRV dropped -63.89% vs FETH's -67.94%.

On 1-year performance, FDRV leads with 21.47% vs -46.78% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FDRV has been the lower-risk option at 7.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FDRV has performed better with a 21.47% return vs -46.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDRV.

FDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

FDRV is categorized as Technology Equities, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDRV and 0.25% for FETH.

FDRV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDRV and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer