PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRV vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDRV vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRV achieves a 30.92% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -25.34% return.


FDRV

1D
-0.86%
1M
11.72%
YTD
30.92%
6M
29.26%
1Y
53.50%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
10Y*

FBTC

1D
-2.65%
1M
-18.37%
YTD
-25.34%
6M
-29.78%
1Y
-38.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRV vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
30.92%24.32%-12.98%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
-25.34%-6.56%99.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRV and FBTC is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDRV vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRV
FDRV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FDRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDRV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FDRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDRV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRV vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDRVFBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.86

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

-0.79

+4.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.66

-1.36

+12.02

FDRV vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRV and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDRVFBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

-0.89

+3.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.30

-0.40

Drawdowns

FDRV vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRV drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, which is greater than FBTC's maximum drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRV and FBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRVFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.89%

-49.33%

-14.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.62%

-49.33%

+33.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.57%

-48.00%

+20.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.35%

-16.01%

-26.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

28.41%

-23.38%

Volatility

FDRV vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) have volatilities of 9.01% and 9.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDRVFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.01%

9.39%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.49%

34.38%

-15.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.09%

43.61%

-18.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.03%

50.13%

-18.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.03%

50.13%

-18.10%

FDRV vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDRV vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

FDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
1.02%1.14%0.43%0.24%0.33%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDRV and FBTC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTC has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to FDRV (9.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRV dropped -63.89% vs FBTC's -49.33%.

On 1-year performance, FDRV leads with 53.50% vs -38.65% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FDRV has been the lower-risk option at 9.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FDRV has performed better with a 53.50% return vs -38.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDRV.

FDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

FDRV is categorized as Transportation Equities, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDRV and 0.25% for FBTC.

FDRV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDRV and FBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer