FDRV vs. DRIV
FDRV (Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDRV is a Transportation Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while DRIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. FDRV is actively managed, while DRIV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDRV returned 7.13%/yr vs 21.80%/yr for DRIV. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDRV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for DRIV.
Performance
FDRV vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDRV achieves a 30.92% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 42.27% return.
FDRV
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 11.72%
- YTD
- 30.92%
- 6M
- 29.26%
- 1Y
- 53.50%
- 3Y*
- 7.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRIV
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- 42.27%
- 6M
- 41.87%
- 1Y
- 92.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- —
FDRV vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF | 30.92% | 24.32% | -21.73% | 12.27% | -44.23% | 7.00% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 42.27% | 30.42% | -5.04% | 26.14% | -34.13% | 10.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRV and DRIV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FDRV and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDRV vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDRV
DRIV
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDRV
DRIV
Technology
FDRV
DRIV
Industrials
FDRV
DRIV
Basic Materials
FDRV
DRIV
Communication Services
FDRV
-
DRIV
Consumer Defensive
FDRV
-
DRIV
-
Energy
FDRV
-
DRIV
-
Financial Services
FDRV
-
DRIV
-
Healthcare
FDRV
-
DRIV
-
Real Estate
FDRV
-
DRIV
-
Utilities
FDRV
-
DRIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRV vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank
FDRV
DRIV
FDRV vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDRV | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.15 | 3.70 | -1.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | 4.35 | -1.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.55 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 6.92 | -3.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.66 | 24.10 | -13.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDRV | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 3.70 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.54 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
FDRV vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRV drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, which is greater than DRIV's maximum drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRV and DRIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRV | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.89% | -41.93% | -21.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.62% | -13.43% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.45% | -34.18% | -14.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.57% | -1.04% | -26.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.35% | -15.13% | -27.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.03% | 3.85% | +1.18% |
Volatility
FDRV vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) have volatilities of 9.01% and 9.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRV | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.01% | 9.36% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.49% | 19.29% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.09% | 25.14% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.03% | 27.07% | +4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.03% | 27.40% | +4.63% |
FDRV vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRV vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison
FDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than DRIV's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.75% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% |
FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 0.43% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FDRV and DRIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DRIV has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to FDRV (9.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRV dropped -63.89% vs DRIV's -41.93%.
On 3-year performance, DRIV leads with 21.80% vs 7.13% for FDRV. On fees, FDRV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FDRV has been the lower-risk option at 9.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DRIV has performed better with a 21.80% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDRV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DRIV.
FDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.75% for DRIV.
FDRV is categorized as Transportation Equities, while DRIV is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDRV and 0.68% for DRIV.
DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDRV and DRIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer