PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRV vs. DRIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDRV vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRV achieves a 30.92% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 42.27% return.


FDRV

1D
-0.86%
1M
11.72%
YTD
30.92%
6M
29.26%
1Y
53.50%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
10Y*

DRIV

1D
-1.04%
1M
12.34%
YTD
42.27%
6M
41.87%
1Y
92.43%
3Y*
21.80%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRV vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
30.92%24.32%-21.73%12.27%-44.23%7.00%
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
42.27%30.42%-5.04%26.14%-34.13%10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRV and DRIV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021

0.94

The correlation between FDRV and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDRV vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDRV
DRIV

Consumer Cyclical

42.8%
26.8%

Technology

40.7%
34.0%

Industrials

12.3%
19.4%

Basic Materials

4.3%
14.4%

Communication Services

-

5.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

FDRV
42.8%
DRIV
26.8%

Technology

FDRV
40.7%
DRIV
34.0%

Industrials

FDRV
12.3%
DRIV
19.4%

Basic Materials

FDRV
4.3%
DRIV
14.4%

Communication Services

FDRV

-

DRIV
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

FDRV

-

DRIV

-

Energy

FDRV

-

DRIV

-

Financial Services

FDRV

-

DRIV

-

Healthcare

FDRV

-

DRIV

-

Real Estate

FDRV

-

DRIV

-

Utilities

FDRV

-

DRIV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDRV vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRV
FDRV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FDRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDRV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FDRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDRV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIV
DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRV vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDRVDRIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

3.70

-1.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.83

4.35

-1.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.55

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

6.92

-3.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.66

24.10

-13.44

FDRV vs. DRIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the DRIV Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRV and DRIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDRVDRIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

3.70

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.54

-0.65

Drawdowns

FDRV vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRV drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, which is greater than DRIV's maximum drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRV and DRIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRVDRIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.89%

-41.93%

-21.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.62%

-13.43%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.45%

-34.18%

-14.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.57%

-1.04%

-26.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.35%

-15.13%

-27.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

3.85%

+1.18%

Volatility

FDRV vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) have volatilities of 9.01% and 9.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDRVDRIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.01%

9.36%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.49%

19.29%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.09%

25.14%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.03%

27.07%

+4.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.03%

27.40%

+4.63%

FDRV vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDRV vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison

FDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than DRIV's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
0.75%1.07%2.07%1.62%1.24%0.32%0.29%1.23%2.79%
FDRV
Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
1.02%1.14%0.43%0.24%0.33%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FDRV and DRIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DRIV has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to FDRV (9.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRV dropped -63.89% vs DRIV's -41.93%.

On 3-year performance, DRIV leads with 21.80% vs 7.13% for FDRV. On fees, FDRV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FDRV has been the lower-risk option at 9.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DRIV has performed better with a 21.80% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDRV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DRIV.

FDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.75% for DRIV.

FDRV is categorized as Transportation Equities, while DRIV is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDRV and 0.68% for DRIV.

DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDRV and DRIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer