FDRV vs. CRTC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FDRV (Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. FDRV is actively managed, while CRTC is passively managed. Over the past year, FDRV returned 21.47% vs 17.24% for CRTC. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FDRV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.

Performance

FDRV vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FDRV having a 9.64% return and CRTC slightly lower at 9.47%.

FDRV

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -5.30%
• 6M: 8.32%
• YTD: 9.64%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: -2.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -6.71%

CRTC

• 1D: 2.36%
• 1M: 3.10%
• 6M: 7.08%
• YTD: 9.47%
• 1Y: 17.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	$249.56K	$623.71K	$501.58K
FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF	$89.45K	$140.01K	$198.80K

FDRV vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF	9.64%	24.32%	-21.73%	7.40%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	9.47%	18.69%	18.05%	7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRV and CRTC is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023	0.65

The correlation between FDRV and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDRV vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDRV	CRTC
Consumer Cyclical	48.6%	4.9%
Technology	37.2%	39.6%
Industrials	10.9%	13.4%
Basic Materials	3.2%	3.0%
Communication Services	-	14.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	5.8%
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	13.5%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	5.5%

Return for Risk

FDRV vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDRV

FDRV Risk / Return Rank: 32
FDRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
FDRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FDRV Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FDRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FDRV Martin Ratio Rank: 32

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 47
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDRV vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDRV	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	1.24	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	1.73	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.22	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	1.91	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.98	6.01	-3.03

FDRV vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRV Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRV and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDRV vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRV drawdown since its inception was -63.89%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRV and CRTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDRV	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.89%	-19.07%	-44.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.84%	-9.05%	-9.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.34%	-0.47%	-38.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.10%	-2.23%	-39.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.22%	2.88%	+4.34%

Volatility

FDRV vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 4.30%. This indicates that FDRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDRV	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.75%	4.30%	+3.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.53%	11.00%	+11.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.71%	14.04%	+13.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.16%	15.82%	+16.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.16%	15.82%	+16.34%

FDRV vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDRV vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

FDRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than CRTC's 0.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.87%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%
FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF	1.30%	1.14%	0.43%	0.24%	0.33%	0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDRV and CRTC in my portfolio?

FDRV and CRTC have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDRV or CRTC?

FDRV has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to CRTC (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRV dropped -63.89% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

Which ETF is better, FDRV or CRTC?

On 1-year performance, FDRV leads with 21.47% vs 17.24% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDRV or CRTC?

Over the 1-year period, FDRV has performed better with a 21.47% return vs 17.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDRV or CRTC?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDRV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDRV or CRTC?

FDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.87% for CRTC.

What is the main difference between FDRV and CRTC?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDRV and 0.35% for CRTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.