FDRS vs. PSCX
FDRS (Founder-Led ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FDRS is passively managed, while PSCX is actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDRS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.
Performance
FDRS vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDRS achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than PSCX's 5.25% return.
FDRS
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 10.17%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 6.09%
- 1Y
- 15.59%
- 3Y*
- 13.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- —
FDRS vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDRS Founder-Led ETF | 1.52% | -1.10% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 5.25% | 0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRS and PSCX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRS vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank
FDRS
PSCX
FDRS vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDRS | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 1.28 | -1.24 |
Drawdowns
FDRS vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRS drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRS and PSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRS | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.64% | -10.20% | -11.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.31% | 0.00% | -3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.35% | -1.86% | -7.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.82% | — |
Volatility
FDRS vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRS | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.36% | 5.52% | +22.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.36% | 7.07% | +21.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.36% | 6.96% | +21.40% |
FDRS vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRS vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison
Neither FDRS nor PSCX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRS and PSCX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDRS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDRS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.
FDRS and PSCX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FDRS and 0.75% for PSCX.
Find the right allocation for FDRS and PSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer