FDRS vs. MTUM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FDRS (Founder-Led ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDRS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Founder Led Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDRS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.

Performance

FDRS vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRS achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 30.30% return.

FDRS

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 10.17%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MTUM

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 11.94%
• YTD: 30.30%
• 6M: 29.99%
• 1Y: 40.55%
• 3Y*: 34.34%
• 5Y*: 14.96%
• 10Y*: 17.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRS vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDRS Founder-Led ETF	1.52%	-1.10%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	30.30%	-0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRS and MTUM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025	0.58

Return for Risk

FDRS vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUM

MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 68
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 64
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRS vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDRS	MTUM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.84	-0.81

Drawdowns

FDRS vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRS drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRS and MTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDRS	MTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.64%	-34.08%	+12.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.54%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.99%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.28%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.31%	-1.10%	-2.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.35%	-6.21%	-3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDRS	MTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.67%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.51%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.36%	19.08%	+9.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.36%	20.60%	+7.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.36%	21.03%	+7.33%

FDRS vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDRS vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

FDRS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDRS Founder-Led ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	0.60%	0.91%	0.75%	1.35%	1.80%	0.55%	0.83%	1.48%	1.27%	1.02%	1.43%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDRS and MTUM in my portfolio?

FDRS and MTUM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FDRS or MTUM?

On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDRS or MTUM?

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FDRS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDRS or MTUM?

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for FDRS.

What is the main difference between FDRS and MTUM?

FDRS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. FDRS tracks Founder Led Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FDRS and 0.15% for MTUM.