FDRS vs. CNAV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FDRS (Founder-Led ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FDRS is passively managed, while CNAV is actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDRS charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

FDRS vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRS achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 45.35% return.

FDRS

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 10.17%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNAV

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 15.60%
• YTD: 45.35%
• 6M: 44.98%
• 1Y: 69.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRS vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDRS Founder-Led ETF	1.52%	-1.10%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	45.35%	-0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRS and CNAV is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025	0.40

Return for Risk

FDRS vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 85
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 79
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRS vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDRS	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	1.57	-1.54

Drawdowns

FDRS vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRS drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRS and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDRS	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.64%	-30.06%	+8.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.31%	-1.30%	-2.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.35%	-5.41%	-3.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDRS	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.09%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.36%	25.12%	+3.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.36%	27.15%	+1.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.36%	27.15%	+1.21%

FDRS vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDRS vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDRS nor CNAV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDRS and CNAV in my portfolio?

FDRS and CNAV have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FDRS or CNAV?

On fees, FDRS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDRS or CNAV?

FDRS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDRS or CNAV?

FDRS and CNAV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FDRS and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FDRS and 1.31% for CNAV.