FDRR vs. DMAY
FDRR (Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FDRR tracks the Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates while DMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDRR returned 12.13%/yr vs 6.78%/yr for DMAY. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDRR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
FDRR vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDRR achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 3.36% return.
FDRR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 7.87%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 26.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.13%
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 3.36%
- 6M
- 3.37%
- 1Y
- 10.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- —
FDRR vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | 7.87% | 21.70% | 20.24% | 13.66% | -9.73% | 26.06% | 31.94% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 3.36% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -9.98% | 6.14% | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRR and DMAY is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020 | 0.85 |
The correlation between FDRR and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDRR vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDRR
DMAY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
FDRR
DMAY
Financial Services
FDRR
DMAY
Communication Services
FDRR
DMAY
Healthcare
FDRR
DMAY
Industrials
FDRR
DMAY
Consumer Cyclical
FDRR
DMAY
Consumer Defensive
FDRR
DMAY
Energy
FDRR
DMAY
Real Estate
FDRR
DMAY
Utilities
FDRR
DMAY
Basic Materials
FDRR
DMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRR vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
FDRR
DMAY
FDRR vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDRR | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.47 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 3.23 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.81 | 18.05 | -5.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDRR vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRR | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.52% | -13.90% | -22.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -3.36% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.04% | -12.38% | -5.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -13.90% | -7.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.08% | -1.31% | -1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -2.23% | -1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 0.60% | +1.48% |
Volatility
FDRR vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 2.26%. This indicates that FDRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRR | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 2.26% | +1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.68% | 4.30% | +4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.25% | 5.09% | +6.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 9.07% | +5.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 8.43% | +8.43% |
FDRR vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRR vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | 2.16% | 2.21% | 2.61% | 2.93% | 2.75% | 2.09% | 2.85% | 2.89% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRR and DMAY have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDRR has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to DMAY (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRR dropped -36.52% vs DMAY's -13.90%.
On 5-year performance, FDRR leads with 12.13% vs 6.78% for DMAY. On fees, FDRR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDRR has performed better with a 12.13% return vs 6.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDRR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
FDRR has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
FDRR tracks Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FDRR and 0.85% for DMAY.
FDRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDRR and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer