PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDN vs. VV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDN vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDN achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than VV's 10.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FDN has underperformed VV with an annualized return of 14.37%, while VV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.


FDN

1D
-1.90%
1M
4.74%
YTD
4.18%
6M
3.26%
1Y
10.29%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
14.37%

VV

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.69%
6M
10.54%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDN vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index
4.18%10.70%30.35%51.48%-45.54%6.55%52.55%19.25%6.17%37.64%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
10.69%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FDN and VV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2006

0.81

The correlation between FDN and VV shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDN vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDN
VV

Technology

37.7%
35.9%

Communication Services

29.7%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

27.7%
9.8%

Financial Services

2.4%
11.8%

Industrials

1.4%
8.0%

Healthcare

1.1%
8.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Energy

-

3.6%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Technology

FDN
37.7%
VV
35.9%

Communication Services

FDN
29.7%
VV
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FDN
27.7%
VV
9.8%

Financial Services

FDN
2.4%
VV
11.8%

Industrials

FDN
1.4%
VV
8.0%

Healthcare

FDN
1.1%
VV
8.6%

Basic Materials

FDN

-

VV
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

FDN

-

VV
4.8%

Energy

FDN

-

VV
3.6%

Real Estate

FDN

-

VV
1.7%

Utilities

FDN

-

VV
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDN vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDN
FDN Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDN Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDN Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDN vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDNVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.42

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

3.03

-2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.24

13.86

-12.62

FDN vs. VV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDN Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the VV Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDN and VV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDNVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

2.33

-1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.79

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.86

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.59

-0.05

Drawdowns

FDN vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than VV's maximum drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN and VV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDNVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.55%

-54.81%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.31%

-9.21%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

-18.97%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.97%

-25.66%

-28.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.97%

-34.28%

-19.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.22%

-0.72%

-2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.82%

-6.84%

-4.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.35%

2.01%

+6.34%

Volatility

FDN vs. VV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) at 2.84%. This indicates that FDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDNVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

2.84%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.44%

8.98%

+5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.04%

11.99%

+7.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.25%

17.22%

+10.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.60%

18.19%

+7.41%

FDN vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDN has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDN vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

FDN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
0.98%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDN and VV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDN has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to VV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDN dropped -61.55% vs VV's -54.81%.

On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.58% vs 14.37% for FDN. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 14.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for FDN.

VV has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for FDN.

FDN tracks Dow Jones Internet Index, while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for FDN and 0.04% for VV.

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDN and VV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer