FDN vs. SGRT
FDN (First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FDN is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDN charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
FDN vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDN achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.
FDN
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 4.18%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 10.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- 14.37%
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDN vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index | 4.18% | 0.25% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.46% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDN and SGRT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDN vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
FDN
SGRT
FDN vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDN | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDN | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 3.81 | -3.26 |
Drawdowns
FDN vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDN | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -17.87% | -43.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.22% | 0.00% | -3.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.82% | -3.11% | -8.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.35% | — | — |
Volatility
FDN vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDN | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.04% | 33.41% | -14.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.25% | 33.41% | -6.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.60% | 33.41% | -7.81% |
FDN vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDN has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDN vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
FDN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDN and SGRT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDN is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDN is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for FDN.
Their fees differ too: 0.52% for FDN and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for FDN and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer