PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDN vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDN vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDN achieves a 4.35% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 31.40% return.


FDN

1D
0.16%
1M
4.90%
YTD
4.35%
6M
3.44%
1Y
9.38%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*
14.33%

FMTM

1D
-0.26%
1M
4.57%
YTD
31.40%
6M
33.68%
1Y
63.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDN vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FDN and FMTM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDN vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDN
FDN Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDN Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDN Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDN vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDNFMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.46

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

5.28

-4.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.13

20.65

-19.53

FDN vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDN Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDN and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDNFMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

2.81

-2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

2.36

-1.81

Drawdowns

FDN vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN and FMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDNFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.55%

-12.12%

-49.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.31%

-12.12%

-9.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-0.26%

-2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.82%

-1.88%

-9.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.35%

3.10%

+5.25%

Volatility

FDN vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) is 5.14%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that FDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDNFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

6.45%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

17.84%

-3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.03%

22.83%

-3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.24%

22.91%

+4.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.60%

22.91%

+2.69%

FDN vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDN has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDN vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

FDN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FDN and FMTM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMTM has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to FDN (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDN dropped -61.55% vs FMTM's -12.12%.

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.73% vs 9.38% for FDN. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDN has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.73% return vs 9.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for FDN.

FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for FDN.

FDN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for FDN and 0.45% for FMTM.

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDN and FMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer