FDN vs. DARP
FDN (First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index) and DARP (Grizzle Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FDN is passively managed, while DARP is actively managed. Over the past year, FDN returned 10.29% vs 82.62% for DARP. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDN charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DARP.
Performance
FDN vs. DARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDN achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 32.67% return.
FDN
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 4.18%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 10.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- 14.37%
DARP
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 8.18%
- YTD
- 32.67%
- 6M
- 34.22%
- 1Y
- 82.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDN vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index | 4.18% | 10.70% | 30.35% | 14.43% |
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF | 32.67% | 40.19% | 24.63% | 6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDN and DARP is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2023 | 0.70 |
The correlation between FDN and DARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDN vs. DARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDN
DARP
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FDN
DARP
Communication Services
FDN
DARP
Consumer Cyclical
FDN
DARP
Financial Services
FDN
DARP
-
Industrials
FDN
DARP
Healthcare
FDN
DARP
Basic Materials
FDN
-
DARP
Consumer Defensive
FDN
-
DARP
-
Energy
FDN
-
DARP
Real Estate
FDN
-
DARP
-
Utilities
FDN
-
DARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDN vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank
FDN
DARP
FDN vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDN | DARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.54 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 7.03 | -6.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | 26.75 | -25.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDN | DARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 3.59 | -3.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.49 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
FDN vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than DARP's maximum drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN and DARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDN | DARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -30.27% | -31.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.31% | -11.82% | -9.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.22% | -0.76% | -2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.82% | -4.64% | -7.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.35% | 3.10% | +5.25% |
Volatility
FDN vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) is 5.14%, while Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that FDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDN | DARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 7.07% | -1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.44% | 17.49% | -3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.04% | 23.16% | -4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.25% | 26.11% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.60% | 26.11% | -0.51% |
FDN vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDN has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDN vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison
FDN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.43% | 1.93% | 0.32% |
FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDN and DARP have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DARP has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to FDN (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDN dropped -61.55% vs DARP's -30.27%.
On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 82.62% vs 10.29% for FDN. On fees, FDN is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, FDN has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 82.62% return vs 10.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDN is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.
DARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for FDN.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Grizzle. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for FDN and 0.75% for DARP.
DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDN and DARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer