FDMO vs. SPVM
FDMO (Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF) and SPVM (Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - FDMO tracks the Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index while SPVM tracks the S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDMO returned 16.35%/yr vs 10.09%/yr for SPVM. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDMO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SPVM.
Performance
FDMO vs. SPVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly higher than SPVM's 8.29% return.
FDMO
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 15.24%
- 6M
- 14.87%
- 1Y
- 32.96%
- 3Y*
- 28.59%
- 5Y*
- 16.35%
- 10Y*
- —
SPVM
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 19.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
FDMO vs. SPVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF | 15.24% | 21.43% | 32.78% | 24.79% | -19.32% | 22.23% | 21.71% | 25.29% | -4.13% | 23.93% |
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 8.29% | 20.47% | 15.64% | 5.53% | -2.10% | 28.86% | -3.18% | 29.33% | -9.17% | 14.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDMO and SPVM is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | 0.63 |
The correlation between FDMO and SPVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDMO vs. SPVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDMO
SPVM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FDMO
SPVM
Financial Services
FDMO
SPVM
Consumer Cyclical
FDMO
SPVM
Industrials
FDMO
SPVM
Communication Services
FDMO
SPVM
Healthcare
FDMO
SPVM
Consumer Defensive
FDMO
SPVM
Energy
FDMO
SPVM
Utilities
FDMO
SPVM
Real Estate
FDMO
SPVM
Basic Materials
FDMO
SPVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDMO vs. SPVM — Risk / Return Rank
FDMO
SPVM
FDMO vs. SPVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDMO | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 4.29 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.79 | 16.33 | -5.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDMO | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 2.43 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.60 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.63 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
FDMO vs. SPVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum SPVM drawdown of -45.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and SPVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDMO | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -45.35% | +11.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.22% | -6.57% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.88% | -18.66% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -19.48% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.70% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -4.99% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 1.72% | +1.34% |
Volatility
FDMO vs. SPVM - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) at 2.79%. This indicates that FDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDMO | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 2.79% | +2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.11% | 7.48% | +5.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 11.63% | +4.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 16.77% | +2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 19.57% | -0.06% |
FDMO vs. SPVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SPVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDMO vs. SPVM - Dividend Comparison
FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than SPVM's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF | 0.56% | 0.61% | 0.90% | 0.87% | 1.19% | 0.60% | 0.77% | 1.23% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 0.45% | 0.00% |
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 1.91% | 2.02% | 1.91% | 2.45% | 2.33% | 1.41% | 2.11% | 2.40% | 3.10% | 1.68% | 2.80% | 2.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDMO and SPVM have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDMO has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to SPVM (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMO dropped -33.94% vs SPVM's -45.35%.
On 5-year performance, FDMO leads with 16.35% vs 10.09% for SPVM. On fees, FDMO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDMO has performed better with a 16.35% return vs 10.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDMO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.
SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.56% for FDMO.
FDMO tracks Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index, while SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDMO and 0.39% for SPVM.
SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDMO and SPVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer