PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDMO vs. SPVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDMO vs. SPVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly higher than SPVM's 8.29% return.


FDMO

1D
-0.32%
1M
7.12%
YTD
15.24%
6M
14.87%
1Y
32.96%
3Y*
28.59%
5Y*
16.35%
10Y*

SPVM

1D
-0.70%
1M
3.16%
YTD
8.29%
6M
10.61%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDMO vs. SPVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
15.24%21.43%32.78%24.79%-19.32%22.23%21.71%25.29%-4.13%23.93%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
8.29%20.47%15.64%5.53%-2.10%28.86%-3.18%29.33%-9.17%14.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMO and SPVM is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.63

The correlation between FDMO and SPVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDMO vs. SPVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDMO
SPVM

Technology

35.7%
5.3%

Financial Services

11.7%
37.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
6.3%

Industrials

10.1%
4.4%

Communication Services

9.8%
6.6%

Healthcare

8.8%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
8.7%

Utilities

2.3%
14.2%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.9%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.8%

Technology

FDMO
35.7%
SPVM
5.3%

Financial Services

FDMO
11.7%
SPVM
37.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FDMO
10.1%
SPVM
6.3%

Industrials

FDMO
10.1%
SPVM
4.4%

Communication Services

FDMO
9.8%
SPVM
6.6%

Healthcare

FDMO
8.8%
SPVM
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

FDMO
4.0%
SPVM
4.9%

Energy

FDMO
3.5%
SPVM
8.7%

Utilities

FDMO
2.3%
SPVM
14.2%

Real Estate

FDMO
2.0%
SPVM
1.9%

Basic Materials

FDMO
2.0%
SPVM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDMO vs. SPVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDMO
FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SPVM
SPVM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDMO vs. SPVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDMOSPVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

4.29

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.79

16.33

-5.54

FDMO vs. SPVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the SPVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMO and SPVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDMOSPVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.43

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.60

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.63

+0.20

Drawdowns

FDMO vs. SPVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum SPVM drawdown of -45.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and SPVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMOSPVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-45.35%

+11.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-6.57%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.88%

-18.66%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-19.48%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.70%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-4.99%

-0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

1.72%

+1.34%

Volatility

FDMO vs. SPVM - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) at 2.79%. This indicates that FDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMOSPVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

2.79%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

7.48%

+5.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

11.63%

+4.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

16.77%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

19.57%

-0.06%

FDMO vs. SPVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SPVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDMO vs. SPVM - Dividend Comparison

FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than SPVM's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
0.56%0.61%0.90%0.87%1.19%0.60%0.77%1.23%1.22%1.09%0.45%0.00%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
1.91%2.02%1.91%2.45%2.33%1.41%2.11%2.40%3.10%1.68%2.80%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDMO and SPVM have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDMO has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to SPVM (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMO dropped -33.94% vs SPVM's -45.35%.

On 5-year performance, FDMO leads with 16.35% vs 10.09% for SPVM. On fees, FDMO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDMO has performed better with a 16.35% return vs 10.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDMO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.

SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.56% for FDMO.

FDMO tracks Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index, while SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDMO and 0.39% for SPVM.

SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDMO and SPVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer