FDMO vs. PXI
FDMO (Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF) and PXI (Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - FDMO tracks the Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index while PXI tracks the Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDMO returned 14.22%/yr vs 21.98%/yr for PXI. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FDMO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PXI.
Performance
FDMO vs. PXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than PXI's 30.24% return.
FDMO
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- 6M
- 8.79%
- YTD
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- 22.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.49%
- 5Y*
- 14.22%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.38%
PXI
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 8.31%
- 6M
- 18.66%
- YTD
- 30.24%
- 1Y
- 41.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.63%
- 5Y*
- 21.98%
- 10Y*
- 6.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.23M | $8.36M | $6.07M | |
| $1.58M | $2.88M | $1.34M |
FDMO vs. PXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF | 11.50% | 21.43% | 32.78% | 24.79% | -19.32% | 22.23% | 21.71% | 25.29% | -4.13% | 23.93% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 30.24% | 3.86% | 0.76% | 5.48% | 45.85% | 75.05% | -35.91% | 1.67% | -27.56% | -8.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDMO and PXI is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDMO and PXI has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FDMO vs. PXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDMO
PXI
Technology
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
FDMO
PXI
-
Financial Services
FDMO
PXI
Healthcare
FDMO
PXI
-
Industrials
FDMO
PXI
Consumer Cyclical
FDMO
PXI
-
Communication Services
FDMO
PXI
-
Consumer Defensive
FDMO
PXI
-
Energy
FDMO
PXI
Utilities
FDMO
PXI
-
Real Estate
FDMO
PXI
-
Basic Materials
FDMO
PXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDMO vs. PXI — Risk / Return Rank
FDMO
PXI
FDMO vs. PXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDMO | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.30 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 3.33 | -1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.60 | 9.15 | -2.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDMO vs. PXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum PXI drawdown of -85.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and PXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDMO | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -85.08% | +51.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.22% | -12.40% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.88% | -30.74% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -33.47% | +8.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -79.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.32% | -5.12% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -29.25% | +23.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 4.50% | -1.02% |
Volatility
FDMO vs. PXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) is 6.48%, while Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) has a volatility of 7.28%. This indicates that FDMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDMO | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | 7.28% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.86% | 17.97% | -2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.18% | 22.42% | -3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 32.81% | -13.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.63% | 36.94% | -17.31% |
FDMO vs. PXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PXI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDMO vs. PXI - Dividend Comparison
FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than PXI's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF | 0.61% | 0.61% | 0.90% | 0.87% | 1.19% | 0.60% | 0.77% | 1.23% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 0.45% | 0.00% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 3.14% | 0.57% | 1.72% | 2.80% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDMO and PXI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXI has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to FDMO (6.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMO dropped -33.94% vs PXI's -85.08%.
On 5-year performance, PXI leads with 21.98% vs 14.22% for FDMO. On fees, FDMO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PXI has performed better with a 21.98% return vs 14.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDMO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.
PXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.61% for FDMO.
FDMO tracks Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index, while PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDMO and 0.60% for PXI.
PXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDMO and PXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer