PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDMO vs. FCMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDMO vs. FCMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly lower than FCMVX's 23.22% return.


FDMO

1D
-2.80%
1M
2.15%
YTD
14.45%
6M
12.49%
1Y
31.10%
3Y*
27.66%
5Y*
15.71%
10Y*

FCMVX

1D
0.39%
1M
5.66%
YTD
23.22%
6M
21.99%
1Y
40.48%
3Y*
45.23%
5Y*
25.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDMO vs. FCMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
14.45%21.43%32.78%24.79%-19.32%22.23%21.71%25.29%-4.13%13.23%
FCMVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund
23.22%12.62%87.16%23.07%-10.26%34.12%0.52%23.65%-18.69%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMO and FCMVX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.71

The correlation between FDMO and FCMVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDMO vs. FCMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDMO
FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FCMVX
FCMVX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FCMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FCMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDMO vs. FCMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDMOFCMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.43

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

4.10

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.99

15.73

-5.74

FDMO vs. FCMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the FCMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMO and FCMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDMO vs. FCMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum FCMVX drawdown of -44.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and FCMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMOFCMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-44.63%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-10.21%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.88%

-38.56%

+16.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-38.56%

+13.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

0.00%

-2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-9.30%

+3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.65%

+0.47%

Volatility

FDMO vs. FCMVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) has a higher volatility of 7.76% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) at 5.18%. This indicates that FDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMOFCMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

5.18%

+2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.60%

12.46%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.88%

16.66%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.25%

60.61%

-41.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

47.67%

-28.08%

FDMO vs. FCMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FCMVX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDMO vs. FCMVX - Dividend Comparison

FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than FCMVX's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FCMVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund
4.01%6.68%76.67%1.29%1.68%1.39%2.19%1.68%2.99%0.77%0.00%
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
0.59%0.61%0.90%0.87%1.19%0.60%0.77%1.23%1.22%1.09%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDMO and FCMVX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDMO has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to FCMVX (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMO dropped -33.94% vs FCMVX's -44.63%.

FCMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDMO and FCMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer