PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCMVX vs. MDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCMVX vs. MDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCMVX achieves a 17.97% return, which is significantly higher than MDY's 14.02% return.


FCMVX

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.20%
YTD
17.97%
6M
20.63%
1Y
37.95%
3Y*
43.55%
5Y*
23.84%
10Y*

MDY

1D
0.90%
1M
3.28%
YTD
14.02%
6M
15.05%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
15.81%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
11.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCMVX vs. MDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCMVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund
17.97%12.62%87.16%23.07%-10.26%34.12%0.52%23.65%-18.69%12.67%
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
14.02%7.19%13.64%16.07%-13.28%24.53%13.50%25.78%-11.29%10.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FCMVX and MDY is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2017

0.95

The correlation between FCMVX and MDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCMVX vs. MDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCMVX
FCMVX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FCMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FCMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

MDY
MDY Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDY Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDY Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCMVX vs. MDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCMVXMDYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

1.73

+0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.35

2.52

+0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.31

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

3.01

+0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.13

10.99

+3.14

FCMVX vs. MDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the MDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCMVX and MDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCMVXMDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

1.73

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.41

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.53

-0.16

Drawdowns

FCMVX vs. MDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCMVX drawdown since its inception was -44.63%, smaller than the maximum MDY drawdown of -55.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCMVX and MDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCMVXMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.63%

-55.33%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

-8.82%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.56%

-24.03%

-14.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.56%

-24.03%

-14.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

0.00%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.36%

-7.03%

-2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.42%

+0.22%

Volatility

FCMVX vs. MDY - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) at 4.40%. This indicates that FCMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCMVXMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

4.40%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

11.30%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

15.48%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.58%

19.77%

+40.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.80%

21.19%

+26.61%

FCMVX vs. MDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCMVX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MDY's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCMVX vs. MDY - Dividend Comparison

FCMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than MDY's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCMVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund
4.19%6.68%76.67%1.29%1.68%1.39%2.19%1.68%2.99%0.77%0.00%0.00%
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
1.04%1.15%1.18%1.21%1.37%0.96%1.12%1.34%1.39%1.18%1.31%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FCMVX and MDY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCMVX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to MDY (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCMVX dropped -44.63% vs MDY's -55.33%.

FCMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCMVX and MDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer