FDMO vs. DVOL
FDMO (Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF) and DVOL (First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF) are both Momentum funds - FDMO tracks the Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index while DVOL tracks the Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDMO returned 16.35%/yr vs 6.82%/yr for DVOL. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDMO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DVOL.
Performance
FDMO vs. DVOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly higher than DVOL's 1.61% return.
FDMO
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 15.24%
- 6M
- 14.87%
- 1Y
- 32.96%
- 3Y*
- 28.59%
- 5Y*
- 16.35%
- 10Y*
- —
DVOL
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 0.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- —
FDMO vs. DVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF | 15.24% | 21.43% | 32.78% | 24.79% | -19.32% | 22.23% | 21.71% | 25.29% | -14.29% |
DVOL First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF | 1.61% | 4.30% | 24.84% | 5.39% | -16.10% | 30.08% | 11.15% | 26.10% | -9.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDMO and DVOL is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDMO and DVOL has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FDMO vs. DVOL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDMO
DVOL
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FDMO
DVOL
Financial Services
FDMO
DVOL
Consumer Cyclical
FDMO
DVOL
Industrials
FDMO
DVOL
Communication Services
FDMO
DVOL
Healthcare
FDMO
DVOL
Consumer Defensive
FDMO
DVOL
Energy
FDMO
DVOL
Utilities
FDMO
DVOL
Real Estate
FDMO
DVOL
Basic Materials
FDMO
DVOL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDMO vs. DVOL — Risk / Return Rank
FDMO
DVOL
FDMO vs. DVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDMO | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.02 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 0.08 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.79 | 0.30 | +10.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDMO | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 0.07 | +1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.48 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.50 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
FDMO vs. DVOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum DVOL drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and DVOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDMO | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -38.26% | +4.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.22% | -9.82% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.88% | -11.66% | -10.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | -24.65% | -0.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -4.85% | +4.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -7.17% | +1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.87% | +0.19% |
Volatility
FDMO vs. DVOL - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) at 2.91%. This indicates that FDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDMO | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 2.91% | +1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.11% | 9.35% | +3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 11.79% | +4.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 14.40% | +4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 17.72% | +1.79% |
FDMO vs. DVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DVOL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDMO vs. DVOL - Dividend Comparison
FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than DVOL's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVOL First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF | 0.68% | 0.86% | 0.67% | 1.28% | 1.37% | 0.47% | 0.60% | 1.79% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF | 0.56% | 0.61% | 0.90% | 0.87% | 1.19% | 0.60% | 0.77% | 1.23% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDMO and DVOL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDMO has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to DVOL (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMO dropped -33.94% vs DVOL's -38.26%.
On 5-year performance, FDMO leads with 16.35% vs 6.82% for DVOL. On fees, FDMO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DVOL has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDMO has performed better with a 16.35% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDMO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DVOL.
DVOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.56% for FDMO.
FDMO tracks Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index, while DVOL tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDMO and 0.60% for DVOL.
FDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDMO and DVOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer