PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDMO vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDMO vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 71.26% return.


FDMO

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.50%
6M
8.79%
YTD
11.50%
1Y
22.87%
3Y*
25.49%
5Y*
14.22%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.38%

DBE

1D
-4.26%
1M
15.98%
6M
57.84%
YTD
71.26%
1Y
61.44%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
12.24%
ALL TIME*
2.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.27M$1.08M$1.67M
$8.23M$8.36M$6.07M

FDMO vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
11.50%21.43%32.78%24.79%-19.32%22.23%21.71%25.29%-4.13%23.93%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
71.26%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-12.95%5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMO and DBE is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016

0.16

The correlation between FDMO and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDMO vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDMO
FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDMO vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDMODBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.28

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.50

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.60

7.82

-1.22

FDMO vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMO and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDMO vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMODBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-86.69%

+52.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-24.72%

+12.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.88%

-24.72%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-38.74%

+13.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.32%

-34.98%

+29.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-57.13%

+51.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

7.90%

-4.42%

Volatility

FDMO vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) is 6.48%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 15.07%. This indicates that FDMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMODBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.48%

15.07%

-8.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.86%

34.26%

-18.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

37.66%

-18.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.46%

30.15%

-10.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.63%

28.60%

-8.97%

FDMO vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDMO vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than DBE's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.26%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%0.00%0.00%
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
0.61%0.61%0.90%0.87%1.19%0.60%0.77%1.23%1.22%1.09%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDMO and DBE have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (15.07%) compared to FDMO (6.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMO dropped -33.94% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 17.82% vs 14.22% for FDMO. On fees, FDMO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 17.82% return vs 14.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDMO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.61% for FDMO.

FDMO is categorized as Momentum, while DBE is Oil & Gas. FDMO tracks Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDMO and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDMO and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer