PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDMO vs. BUFZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FDMO vs. BUFZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FDMO vs. BUFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
-4.46%21.43%32.78%18.06%
BUFZ
FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF
-0.98%11.05%11.48%8.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a -4.46% return, which is significantly lower than BUFZ's -0.98% return.


FDMO

1D
3.97%
1M
-4.65%
YTD
-4.46%
6M
-3.37%
1Y
23.95%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*

BUFZ

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
1.43%
1Y
11.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDMO vs. BUFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FDMO vs. BUFZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDMO
FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFZ
BUFZ Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BUFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDMO vs. BUFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDMOBUFZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

1.25

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

1.85

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

1.73

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.44

9.89

-2.45

FDMO vs. BUFZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the BUFZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMO and BUFZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDMOBUFZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.25

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.69

-0.97

Correlation

The correlation between FDMO and BUFZ is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FDMO vs. BUFZ - Dividend Comparison

FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while BUFZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
0.67%0.61%0.90%0.87%1.19%0.60%0.77%1.23%1.22%1.09%0.45%
BUFZ
FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FDMO vs. BUFZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than BUFZ's maximum drawdown of -10.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and BUFZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMOBUFZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-10.14%

-23.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-6.98%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.73%

-2.01%

-6.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-0.68%

-4.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

1.22%

+2.14%

Volatility

FDMO vs. BUFZ - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) at 2.81%. This indicates that FDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FDMOBUFZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

2.81%

+4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.62%

4.14%

+9.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.23%

9.49%

+12.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.98%

7.50%

+11.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

7.50%

+12.05%