PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDMLX vs. FSELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDMLX vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMLX achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 85.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FDMLX has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of 12.55%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 39.21% annualized return.


FDMLX

1D
0.52%
1M
3.27%
YTD
10.07%
6M
10.32%
1Y
22.65%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
12.55%

FSELX

1D
6.35%
1M
26.53%
YTD
85.56%
6M
83.27%
1Y
166.37%
3Y*
68.85%
5Y*
46.95%
10Y*
39.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDMLX vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDMLX
Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund
10.07%11.64%10.76%19.77%-3.24%27.54%11.45%17.72%-7.17%24.39%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
85.56%52.17%49.68%78.49%-35.27%59.16%44.33%64.50%-12.01%34.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMLX and FSELX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2012

0.61

The correlation between FDMLX and FSELX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDMLX vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDMLX
FDMLX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FDMLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDMLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDMLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FDMLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDMLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FSELX
FSELX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FSELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSELX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FSELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDMLX vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDMLXFSELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.71

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

12.18

-9.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.64

46.77

-38.13

FDMLX vs. FSELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 5.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMLX and FSELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDMLXFSELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

5.35

-3.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

1.21

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

1.12

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.55

+0.21

Drawdowns

FDMLX vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMLX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMLX and FSELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMLXFSELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.03%

-82.54%

+47.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-14.38%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.52%

-36.31%

+12.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.52%

-46.37%

+22.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.03%

-46.37%

+11.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

-28.70%

+24.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

3.74%

-0.92%

Volatility

FDMLX vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) is 3.75%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 12.01%. This indicates that FDMLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMLXFSELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

12.01%

-8.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

25.42%

-15.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.29%

32.74%

-18.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.88%

38.97%

-17.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.21%

35.07%

-15.86%

FDMLX vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMLX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDMLX vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison

FDMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.56%, more than FSELX's 8.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDMLX
Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund
10.56%11.63%12.75%24.60%65.08%18.63%4.18%4.94%9.28%4.53%1.51%5.76%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
8.83%11.11%7.97%7.20%6.69%6.99%8.13%3.36%26.80%14.44%3.82%15.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDMLX and FSELX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSELX has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to FDMLX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMLX dropped -35.03% vs FSELX's -82.54%.

FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.35 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDMLX and FSELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer