FDMLX vs. ACMVX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDMLX (Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund) and ACMVX (American Century Mid Cap Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FDMLX returned 12.55%/yr vs 8.93%/yr for ACMVX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDMLX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ACMVX.

Performance

FDMLX vs. ACMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund (ACMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMLX achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly higher than ACMVX's 8.22% return. Over the past 10 years, FDMLX has outperformed ACMVX with an annualized return of 12.55%, while ACMVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.93% annualized return.

FDMLX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 3.27%
• YTD: 10.07%
• 6M: 10.32%
• 1Y: 22.65%
• 3Y*: 16.72%
• 5Y*: 9.76%
• 10Y*: 12.55%

ACMVX

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 2.24%
• YTD: 8.22%
• 6M: 7.90%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: 11.02%
• 5Y*: 6.87%
• 10Y*: 8.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDMLX vs. ACMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDMLX Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund	10.07%	11.64%	10.76%	19.77%	-3.24%	27.54%	11.45%	17.72%	-7.17%	24.39%
ACMVX American Century Mid Cap Value Fund	8.22%	8.77%	8.50%	6.18%	-1.34%	23.41%	1.63%	28.89%	-12.63%	11.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMLX and ACMVX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2012	0.88

The correlation between FDMLX and ACMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDMLX vs. ACMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDMLX

FDMLX Risk / Return Rank: 39
FDMLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FDMLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FDMLX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FDMLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
FDMLX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

ACMVX

ACMVX Risk / Return Rank: 26
ACMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
ACMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
ACMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
ACMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
ACMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDMLX vs. ACMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and American Century Mid Cap Value Fund (ACMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDMLX	ACMVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	1.42	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	2.16	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.25	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	1.99	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.64	6.42	+2.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDMLX vs. ACMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the ACMVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMLX and ACMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDMLX	ACMVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.71	1.42	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.47	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.51	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.55	+0.21

Drawdowns

FDMLX vs. ACMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMLX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, smaller than the maximum ACMVX drawdown of -51.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMLX and ACMVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDMLX	ACMVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.03%	-51.19%	+16.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.19%	-8.49%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.52%	-14.57%	-8.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.52%	-17.46%	-6.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.03%	-39.24%	+4.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.39%	+1.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.56%	-5.93%	+1.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	2.63%	+0.19%

Volatility

FDMLX vs. ACMVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to American Century Mid Cap Value Fund (ACMVX) at 3.01%. This indicates that FDMLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDMLX	ACMVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	3.01%	+0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.75%	8.50%	+1.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.29%	11.88%	+2.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.88%	14.64%	+7.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.21%	17.45%	+1.76%

FDMLX vs. ACMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMLX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ACMVX's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDMLX vs. ACMVX - Dividend Comparison

FDMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.56%, less than ACMVX's 13.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACMVX American Century Mid Cap Value Fund	13.30%	14.46%	8.76%	5.24%	15.00%	15.95%	1.83%	1.46%	14.51%	9.49%	4.05%	11.06%
FDMLX Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund	10.56%	11.63%	12.75%	24.60%	65.08%	18.63%	4.18%	4.94%	9.28%	4.53%	1.51%	5.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDMLX and ACMVX in my portfolio?

FDMLX and ACMVX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDMLX or ACMVX?

FDMLX has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to ACMVX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMLX dropped -35.03% vs ACMVX's -51.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDMLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.