PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDM vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDM vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDM achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 8.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FDM has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 12.29%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


FDM

1D
0.76%
1M
4.64%
YTD
13.86%
6M
12.43%
1Y
30.56%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
12.29%

VTI

1D
-1.39%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
8.82%
6M
7.71%
1Y
24.22%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
15.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDM vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
13.86%18.64%13.00%12.76%-11.61%35.08%-4.04%27.45%-13.53%8.72%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
8.82%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FDM and VTI is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2005

0.78

The correlation between FDM and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDM vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDM
VTI

Financial Services

42.2%
11.3%

Industrials

14.9%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
9.7%

Technology

6.8%
37.0%

Healthcare

6.2%
9.0%

Energy

4.6%
3.3%

Basic Materials

4.5%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.3%

Communication Services

3.3%
9.8%

Real Estate

1.4%
2.3%

Utilities

1.0%
2.1%

Financial Services

FDM
42.2%
VTI
11.3%

Industrials

FDM
14.9%
VTI
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FDM
10.4%
VTI
9.7%

Technology

FDM
6.8%
VTI
37.0%

Healthcare

FDM
6.2%
VTI
9.0%

Energy

FDM
4.6%
VTI
3.3%

Basic Materials

FDM
4.5%
VTI
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

FDM
4.5%
VTI
4.3%

Communication Services

FDM
3.3%
VTI
9.8%

Real Estate

FDM
1.4%
VTI
2.3%

Utilities

FDM
1.0%
VTI
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDM vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDM
FDM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDM Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDM vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDMVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.73

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.96

12.14

-2.18

FDM vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDM and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDM vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDM drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDM and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.45%

-55.45%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-8.92%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.47%

-19.30%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

-25.36%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.76%

-35.00%

-12.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.85%

+2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.32%

-8.01%

-3.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

2.00%

+1.08%

Volatility

FDM vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 4.79% and 4.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

4.95%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.23%

10.05%

+3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.84%

12.83%

+6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.40%

17.51%

+3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.36%

18.32%

+5.04%

FDM vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDM vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

FDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than VTI's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
1.21%1.43%1.56%1.81%1.80%1.08%1.68%1.37%1.26%0.97%1.13%1.45%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDM and VTI have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to FDM (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDM dropped -63.45% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.14% vs 12.29% for FDM. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FDM has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FDM.

FDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 1.04% for VTI.

FDM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. FDM tracks Dow Jones Select Microcap Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FDM and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDM and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer