FDLS vs. SRHQ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FDLS (Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF) and SRHQ (SRH U.S. Quality ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - FDLS tracks the WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross while SRHQ tracks the SRH US Quality Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDLS returned 18.16%/yr vs 17.28%/yr for SRHQ. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDLS charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SRHQ.

Performance

FDLS vs. SRHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLS achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly lower than SRHQ's 20.66% return.

FDLS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.08%
• 6M: 12.03%
• YTD: 18.71%
• 1Y: 34.18%
• 3Y*: 18.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SRHQ

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: 6.20%
• 6M: 15.38%
• YTD: 20.66%
• 1Y: 30.10%
• 3Y*: 17.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDLS vs. SRHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF	18.71%	22.47%	7.41%	20.70%	5.04%
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	20.66%	7.34%	16.49%	21.81%	5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLS and SRHQ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2022	0.83

The correlation between FDLS and SRHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDLS vs. SRHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDLS	SRHQ
Technology	26.0%	19.8%
Industrials	17.8%	19.9%
Financial Services	13.5%	9.6%
Healthcare	11.8%	21.5%
Energy	8.0%	1.1%
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	13.9%
Basic Materials	5.0%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	5.5%
Real Estate	3.1%	1.2%
Communication Services	2.5%	2.0%
Utilities	1.7%	1.2%

Return for Risk

FDLS vs. SRHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLS

FDLS Risk / Return Rank: 81
FDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

SRHQ

SRHQ Risk / Return Rank: 83
SRHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
SRHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
SRHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 75
SRHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SRHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLS vs. SRHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDLS	SRHQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	2.03	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	2.85	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.35	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	4.80	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.26	16.81	-2.55

FDLS vs. SRHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLS Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the SRHQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLS and SRHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDLS vs. SRHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLS drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, which is greater than SRHQ's maximum drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLS and SRHQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDLS	SRHQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.32%	-18.50%	-4.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.55%	-6.31%	-3.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	-18.50%	-4.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	0.00%	-0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.79%	-3.00%	-0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	1.80%	+0.60%

Volatility

FDLS vs. SRHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) is 3.02%, while SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that FDLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDLS	SRHQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.02%	4.15%	-1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.55%	11.07%	+1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.93%	14.86%	+2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.95%	15.97%	+2.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.95%	15.97%	+2.98%

FDLS vs. SRHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than SRHQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDLS vs. SRHQ - Dividend Comparison

FDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than SRHQ's 0.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF	0.80%	0.86%	7.26%	0.97%	0.31%
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	0.69%	0.76%	0.66%	0.84%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDLS and SRHQ in my portfolio?

FDLS and SRHQ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDLS or SRHQ?

SRHQ has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to FDLS (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLS dropped -23.32% vs SRHQ's -18.50%.

Which ETF is better, FDLS or SRHQ?

On 3-year performance, FDLS leads with 18.16% vs 17.28% for SRHQ. On fees, SRHQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FDLS has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDLS or SRHQ?

Over the 3-year period, FDLS has performed better with a 18.16% return vs 17.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDLS or SRHQ?

SRHQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for FDLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDLS or SRHQ?

FDLS has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.69% for SRHQ.

What is the main difference between FDLS and SRHQ?

FDLS tracks WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SRHQ tracks SRH US Quality Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and SRH. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for FDLS and 0.35% for SRHQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SRHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.