FDLS vs. SIXL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDLS (Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF) and SIXL (ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. FDLS is passively managed, while SIXL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDLS returned 19.80%/yr vs 9.35%/yr for SIXL. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDLS charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SIXL.

Performance

FDLS vs. SIXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLS achieves a 16.11% return, which is significantly higher than SIXL's 7.20% return.

FDLS

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 2.31%
• YTD: 16.11%
• 6M: 14.16%
• 1Y: 34.59%
• 3Y*: 19.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SIXL

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 7.20%
• 6M: 5.06%
• 1Y: 7.44%
• 3Y*: 9.35%
• 5Y*: 4.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDLS vs. SIXL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF	16.11%	22.47%	7.41%	20.70%	-1.68%
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	7.20%	-0.61%	14.13%	2.38%	-1.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLS and SIXL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2022	0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between FDLS and SIXL has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDLS vs. SIXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDLS	SIXL
Technology	23.9%	2.6%
Industrials	17.6%	6.4%
Financial Services	13.9%	15.1%
Healthcare	11.2%	14.9%
Energy	6.7%	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	16.8%
Consumer Cyclical	3.7%	6.4%
Basic Materials	2.4%	2.2%
Real Estate	2.1%	13.9%
Utilities	1.7%	17.1%
Communication Services	1.1%	2.6%

Return for Risk

FDLS vs. SIXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLS

FDLS Risk / Return Rank: 71
FDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

SIXL

SIXL Risk / Return Rank: 23
SIXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SIXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
SIXL Omega Ratio Rank: 20
SIXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
SIXL Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLS vs. SIXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDLS	SIXL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	0.75	+1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	1.12	+1.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.13	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	1.15	+2.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.37	3.05	+11.31

FDLS vs. SIXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLS Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the SIXL Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLS and SIXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDLS vs. SIXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLS drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, which is greater than SIXL's maximum drawdown of -16.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLS and SIXL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDLS	SIXL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.32%	-16.08%	-7.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.55%	-6.52%	-3.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	-11.65%	-11.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	-2.60%	+1.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-4.55%	+0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	2.44%	-0.03%

Volatility

FDLS vs. SIXL - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) at 3.79%. This indicates that FDLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDLS	SIXL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.36%	3.79%	+1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.85%	7.21%	+5.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.06%	9.98%	+7.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.07%	12.20%	+6.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.07%	12.57%	+6.50%

FDLS vs. SIXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than SIXL's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDLS vs. SIXL - Dividend Comparison

FDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than SIXL's 2.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF	0.85%	0.86%	7.26%	0.97%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	2.22%	2.31%	1.28%	1.48%	1.45%	0.67%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDLS and SIXL in my portfolio?

FDLS and SIXL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDLS or SIXL?

FDLS has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to SIXL (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLS dropped -23.32% vs SIXL's -16.08%.

Which ETF is better, FDLS or SIXL?

On 3-year performance, FDLS leads with 19.80% vs 9.35% for SIXL. On fees, SIXL is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, SIXL has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDLS or SIXL?

Over the 3-year period, FDLS has performed better with a 19.80% return vs 9.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDLS or SIXL?

SIXL is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for FDLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDLS or SIXL?

SIXL has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.85% for FDLS.

What is the main difference between FDLS and SIXL?

They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for FDLS and 0.47% for SIXL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.