FDLS vs. PTL

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

FDLS (Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF) and PTL (Inspire 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDLS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while PTL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Inspire 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FDLS returned 34.94% vs 23.11% for PTL. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FDLS charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for PTL.

Performance

FDLS vs. PTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and Inspire 500 ETF (PTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLS achieves a 20.96% return, which is significantly higher than PTL's 16.81% return.

FDLS

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 2.23%
• 6M: 14.07%
• YTD: 20.96%
• 1Y: 34.94%
• 3Y*: 18.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.47%

PTL

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 1.56%
• 6M: 13.91%
• YTD: 16.81%
• 1Y: 23.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF	$1.17M	$1.57M	$1.61M
PTL Inspire 500 ETF	$4.68M	$5.04M	$10.60M

FDLS vs. PTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF	20.96%	22.47%	4.45%
PTL Inspire 500 ETF	16.81%	17.92%	7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLS and PTL is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024	0.85

The correlation between FDLS and PTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDLS vs. PTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDLS	PTL
Technology	25.3%	30.7%
Financial Services	15.3%	8.1%
Industrials	13.0%	18.2%
Healthcare	12.8%	5.1%
Energy	9.2%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	6.2%
Basic Materials	7.5%	6.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	2.1%
Communication Services	2.3%	0.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	6.6%
Utilities	1.0%	6.2%

Return for Risk

FDLS vs. PTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDLS

FDLS Risk / Return Rank: 82
FDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

PTL

PTL Risk / Return Rank: 59
PTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
PTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PTL Omega Ratio Rank: 48
PTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
PTL Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDLS vs. PTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and Inspire 500 ETF (PTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDLS	PTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.45	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	2.05	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.26	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.68	3.06	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.57	9.33	+5.24

FDLS vs. PTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLS Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the PTL Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLS and PTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDLS vs. PTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLS drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, which is greater than PTL's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLS and PTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDLS	PTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.32%	-19.72%	-3.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.55%	-7.57%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-1.04%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-2.53%	-1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	2.48%	-0.08%

Volatility

FDLS vs. PTL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) is 3.83%, while Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that FDLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDLS	PTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.83%	4.48%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.46%	12.50%	-0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.03%	15.98%	+1.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.90%	17.74%	+1.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.90%	17.74%	+1.16%

FDLS vs. PTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than PTL's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDLS vs. PTL - Dividend Comparison

FDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than PTL's 1.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF	0.79%	0.86%	7.26%	0.97%	0.31%
PTL Inspire 500 ETF	1.12%	1.24%	0.92%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDLS and PTL in my portfolio?

FDLS and PTL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDLS or PTL?

PTL has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to FDLS (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLS dropped -23.32% vs PTL's -19.72%.

Which ETF is better, FDLS or PTL?

On 1-year performance, FDLS leads with 34.94% vs 23.11% for PTL. On fees, PTL is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FDLS has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDLS or PTL?

Over the 1-year period, FDLS has performed better with a 34.94% return vs 23.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDLS or PTL?

PTL is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for FDLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDLS or PTL?

PTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.79% for FDLS.

What is the main difference between FDLS and PTL?

FDLS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while PTL is Large Cap Blend Equities. FDLS tracks WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while PTL tracks Inspire 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for FDLS and 0.09% for PTL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.