FDLS vs. OILK
FDLS (Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDLS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDLS returned 19.65%/yr vs 19.03%/yr for OILK. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDLS charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
FDLS vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDLS achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
FDLS
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 6M
- 13.26%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
FDLS vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF | 13.12% | 22.47% | 7.41% | 20.70% | -1.68% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | -10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDLS and OILK is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022 | 0.12 |
The correlation between FDLS and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDLS vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDLS
OILK
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FDLS
OILK
-
Industrials
FDLS
OILK
-
Financial Services
FDLS
OILK
-
Healthcare
FDLS
OILK
-
Energy
FDLS
OILK
-
Basic Materials
FDLS
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
FDLS
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDLS
OILK
Communication Services
FDLS
OILK
-
Real Estate
FDLS
OILK
-
Utilities
FDLS
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDLS vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
FDLS
OILK
FDLS vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDLS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 3.42 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.96 | 6.91 | +7.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDLS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 2.06 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.12 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
FDLS vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDLS drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLS and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDLS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.32% | -83.76% | +60.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | -17.35% | +7.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.32% | -23.42% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -3.66% | +1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -32.61% | +28.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 8.56% | -6.19% |
Volatility
FDLS vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) is 4.36%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that FDLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDLS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 10.44% | -6.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.45% | 23.26% | -10.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.71% | 28.75% | -12.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 30.12% | -11.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 35.97% | -16.90% |
FDLS vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDLS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDLS vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
FDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF | 0.87% | 0.86% | 7.26% | 0.97% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDLS and OILK have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to FDLS (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLS dropped -23.32% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 3-year performance, FDLS leads with 19.65% vs 19.03% for OILK. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, FDLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FDLS has performed better with a 19.65% return vs 19.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for FDLS.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.87% for FDLS.
FDLS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. FDLS tracks WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for FDLS and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDLS and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer