PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDLO vs. SPMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDLO vs. SPMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FDLO

1D
0.52%
1M
2.54%
6M
6.36%
YTD
8.41%
1Y
16.67%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.06%

SPMV

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.52M$3.68M$3.65M

FDLO vs. SPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
8.41%11.77%16.06%16.38%-10.38%24.00%12.19%31.10%-0.26%10.02%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
0.87%11.69%18.78%10.28%-10.84%24.35%8.57%32.13%-6.28%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLO and SPMV is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between FDLO and SPMV has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDLO vs. SPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDLO
SPMV

Technology

33.2%
26.9%

Financial Services

13.1%
17.8%

Healthcare

10.6%
15.0%

Communication Services

10.1%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
6.6%

Industrials

8.7%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
10.7%

Energy

3.1%
4.8%

Utilities

2.4%
2.8%

Real Estate

2.3%
0.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.6%

Technology

FDLO
33.2%
SPMV
26.9%

Financial Services

FDLO
13.1%
SPMV
17.8%

Healthcare

FDLO
10.6%
SPMV
15.0%

Communication Services

FDLO
10.1%
SPMV
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FDLO
10.0%
SPMV
6.6%

Industrials

FDLO
8.7%
SPMV
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

FDLO
4.7%
SPMV
10.7%

Energy

FDLO
3.1%
SPMV
4.8%

Utilities

FDLO
2.4%
SPMV
2.8%

Real Estate

FDLO
2.3%
SPMV
0.2%

Basic Materials

FDLO
1.8%
SPMV
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDLO vs. SPMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDLO
FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDLO vs. SPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDLOSPMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

FDLO vs. SPMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDLO vs. SPMV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLOSPMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

Volatility

FDLO vs. SPMV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLOSPMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.43%

FDLO vs. SPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FDLO vs. SPMV - Dividend Comparison

FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while SPMV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
1.37%1.37%1.40%1.35%1.49%1.11%1.38%1.55%1.76%1.61%0.55%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
1.05%1.53%1.53%2.28%1.79%1.28%1.71%3.13%2.11%1.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDLO and SPMV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FDLO.

FDLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.05% for SPMV.

FDLO is categorized as Low Volatility, while SPMV is S&P 500. FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index, while SPMV tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FDLO and 0.10% for SPMV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDLO and SPMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer