PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDLO vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDLO vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a 5.00% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -39.45% return.


FDLO

1D
-0.85%
1M
1.29%
YTD
5.00%
6M
4.24%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
14.30%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*

FETH

1D
-5.78%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.45%
6M
-42.77%
1Y
-31.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDLO vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
5.00%11.77%4.62%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-39.45%-11.37%-3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLO and FETH is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDLO vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLO
FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLO vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDLOFETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.97

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

-0.51

+2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.30

-0.84

+10.14

FDLO vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLO and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDLOFETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

-0.47

+2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

-0.41

+1.24

Drawdowns

FDLO vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLOFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.35%

-64.00%

+29.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-62.95%

+55.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-62.95%

+62.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-32.73%

+29.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

37.82%

-36.19%

Volatility

FDLO vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) is 1.91%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that FDLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLOFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

9.99%

-8.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.41%

46.01%

-39.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.75%

68.50%

-59.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.07%

72.27%

-59.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

72.27%

-56.77%

FDLO vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDLO vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
1.36%1.37%1.40%1.35%1.49%1.11%1.38%1.55%1.76%1.61%0.55%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDLO and FETH have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to FDLO (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLO dropped -34.35% vs FETH's -64.00%.

On 1-year performance, FDLO leads with 15.16% vs -31.75% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, FDLO has been the lower-risk option at 1.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FDLO has performed better with a 15.16% return vs -31.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDLO.

FDLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

FDLO is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index, while FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDLO and 0.00% for FETH.

FDLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDLO and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer