PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDLO vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FDLO vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FDLO vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
-2.35%11.77%4.62%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-27.93%-11.37%-3.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -27.93% return.


FDLO

1D
0.48%
1M
-4.39%
YTD
-2.35%
6M
-0.81%
1Y
8.58%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*

FETH

1D
2.20%
1M
5.07%
YTD
-27.93%
6M
-50.73%
1Y
11.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDLO vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FDLO vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLO
FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLO vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDLOFETHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

0.16

+0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.99

0.79

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.09

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

0.27

+0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.92

0.55

+3.37

FDLO vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLO Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLO and FETH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDLOFETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

0.16

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

-0.34

+1.12

Correlation

The correlation between FDLO and FETH is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FDLO vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
1.46%1.37%1.40%1.35%1.49%1.11%1.38%1.55%1.76%1.61%0.55%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FDLO vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and FETH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLOFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.35%

-64.00%

+29.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-61.74%

+51.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.06%

-55.91%

+50.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-30.53%

+27.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

30.68%

-28.47%

Volatility

FDLO vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) is 3.48%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 19.07%. This indicates that FDLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FDLOFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

19.07%

-15.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.73%

53.60%

-46.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

75.82%

-62.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.12%

74.78%

-61.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

74.78%

-59.18%