FDLO vs. FBND
FDLO (Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDLO is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. FDLO is passively managed, while FBND is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDLO returned 10.20%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FBND. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDLO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.
Performance
FDLO vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.61% return.
FDLO
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 5.38%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 15.69%
- 3Y*
- 14.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- —
FBND
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 5.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.57%
FDLO vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | 5.38% | 11.77% | 16.06% | 16.38% | -10.38% | 24.00% | 12.19% | 31.10% | -0.26% | 20.44% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.61% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDLO and FBND is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | 0.18 |
The correlation between FDLO and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDLO vs. FBND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDLO
FBND
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
FDLO
FBND
-
Financial Services
FDLO
FBND
Communication Services
FDLO
FBND
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDLO
FBND
-
Healthcare
FDLO
FBND
-
Industrials
FDLO
FBND
Consumer Defensive
FDLO
FBND
-
Energy
FDLO
FBND
Utilities
FDLO
FBND
Real Estate
FDLO
FBND
-
Basic Materials
FDLO
FBND
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDLO vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
FDLO
FBND
FDLO vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDLO | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.23 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.91 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.62 | 5.77 | +3.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDLO | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.34 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.15 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.45 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
FDLO vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and FBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDLO | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.35% | -17.25% | -17.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -2.66% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.68% | -5.94% | -7.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | -17.25% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -1.32% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.38% | -3.35% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 0.88% | +0.75% |
Volatility
FDLO vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) has a higher volatility of 1.91% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.26%. This indicates that FDLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDLO | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | 1.26% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.42% | 2.73% | +3.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.75% | 3.86% | +4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 5.92% | +7.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 6.09% | +9.41% |
FDLO vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDLO vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than FBND's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.70% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
FDLO Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | 1.36% | 1.37% | 1.40% | 1.35% | 1.49% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.76% | 1.61% | 0.55% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDLO and FBND have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDLO has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to FBND (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLO dropped -34.35% vs FBND's -17.25%.
On 5-year performance, FDLO leads with 10.20% vs 0.86% for FBND. On fees, FDLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDLO has performed better with a 10.20% return vs 0.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.
FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 1.36% for FDLO.
FDLO is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDLO and 0.36% for FBND.
FDLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDLO and FBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer