PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDL vs. CSTK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FDL vs. CSTK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FDL vs. CSTK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDL achieves a 15.49% return, which is significantly higher than CSTK's 0.02% return.


FDL

1D
0.43%
1M
0.01%
YTD
15.49%
6M
19.42%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
14.12%
10Y*
11.60%

CSTK

1D
2.30%
1M
-5.52%
YTD
0.02%
6M
4.52%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDL vs. CSTK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CSTK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FDL vs. CSTK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

CSTK
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDL vs. CSTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDLCSTKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.63

FDL vs. CSTK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDLCSTKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

1.78

-1.32

Correlation

The correlation between FDL and CSTK is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FDL vs. CSTK - Dividend Comparison

FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than CSTK's 1.97% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.61%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
CSTK
Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF
1.97%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FDL vs. CSTK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDL drawdown since its inception was -65.93%, which is greater than CSTK's maximum drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDL and CSTK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLCSTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.93%

-8.87%

-57.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-6.78%

+6.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.73%

-1.26%

-8.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

Volatility

FDL vs. CSTK - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FDLCSTKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

11.70%

+3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.31%

11.70%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

11.70%

+5.39%