FDIQ vs. XLFI
FDIQ (Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF) and XLFI (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIQ is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index, while XLFI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. FDIQ is passively managed, while XLFI is actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
FDIQ vs. XLFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIQ achieves a 16.09% return, which is significantly higher than XLFI's 2.85% return.
FDIQ
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- YTD
- 16.09%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
XLFI
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- 6M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 2.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDIQ vs. XLFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 16.09% | 5.77% |
XLFI State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 2.85% | 5.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIQ and XLFI is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIQ vs. XLFI — Risk / Return Rank
FDIQ
XLFI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDIQ vs. XLFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDIQ | XLFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDIQ vs. XLFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.86%, which is greater than XLFI's maximum drawdown of -11.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIQ and XLFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIQ | XLFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.86% | -11.89% | -40.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.21% | 0.00% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.53% | -3.13% | -8.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.27% | — | — |
Volatility
FDIQ vs. XLFI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIQ | XLFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.01% | 11.96% | +10.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.45% | 11.96% | +16.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.98% | 11.96% | +19.02% |
FDIQ vs. XLFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FDIQ and XLFI have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
FDIQ vs. XLFI - Dividend Comparison
FDIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than XLFI's 11.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 2.15% | 2.66% | 2.69% | 2.89% | 2.51% | 2.04% | 2.92% | 2.44% | 2.45% | 1.59% | 1.50% | 1.92% |
XLFI State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.32% | 5.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIQ and XLFI have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDIQ and XLFI have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
XLFI has the higher dividend yield at 11.32%, compared with 2.15% for FDIQ.
FDIQ is categorized as Financials Equities, while XLFI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street.
Find the right allocation for FDIQ and XLFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer