FDIQ vs. TRUF
FDIQ (Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF) and TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDIQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUF.
Performance
FDIQ vs. TRUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDIQ
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- YTD
- 16.09%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
TRUF
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 4.66%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDIQ vs. TRUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 4.21% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 15.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIQ and TRUF is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIQ vs. TRUF — Risk / Return Rank
FDIQ
TRUF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDIQ vs. TRUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDIQ | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDIQ vs. TRUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.86%, which is greater than TRUF's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIQ and TRUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIQ | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.86% | -3.24% | -49.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.21% | 0.00% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.53% | -1.07% | -10.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.27% | — | — |
Volatility
FDIQ vs. TRUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIQ | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.01% | 13.66% | +8.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.45% | 13.66% | +14.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.98% | 13.66% | +17.32% |
FDIQ vs. TRUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIQ vs. TRUF - Dividend Comparison
FDIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than TRUF's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 2.15% | 2.66% | 2.69% | 2.89% | 2.51% | 2.04% | 2.92% | 2.44% | 2.45% | 1.59% | 1.50% | 1.92% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIQ and TRUF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FDIQ.
FDIQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.36% for TRUF.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FDIQ and 0.10% for TRUF.
Find the right allocation for FDIQ and TRUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer