PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIQ vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIQ vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIQ achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 4.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIQ has outperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 7.60%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.


FDIQ

1D
-0.97%
1M
-5.53%
YTD
9.72%
6M
10.28%
1Y
22.98%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
7.60%

SPHD

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
4.38%
6M
4.63%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIQ vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
9.72%6.32%12.76%-0.84%-7.23%36.05%-8.95%23.57%-18.31%1.81%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.38%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%-9.98%20.26%-6.17%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIQ and SPHD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2012

0.57

The correlation between FDIQ and SPHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIQ vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIQ
FDIQ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FDIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIQ vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDIQSPHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.11

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

2.78

+2.48

FDIQ vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIQ and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDIQSPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.74

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.39

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.40

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.58

-0.21

Drawdowns

FDIQ vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.86%, which is greater than SPHD's maximum drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIQ and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDIQSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.86%

-41.39%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-7.33%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.09%

-13.29%

-14.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.99%

-19.50%

-23.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.86%

-41.39%

-11.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.53%

-5.37%

-3.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.56%

-4.70%

-6.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

2.93%

+1.45%

Volatility

FDIQ vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 2.99%. This indicates that FDIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDIQSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

2.99%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

7.55%

+6.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.14%

11.04%

+11.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.70%

14.16%

+14.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.12%

17.64%

+13.48%

FDIQ vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDIQ vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

FDIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than SPHD's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
2.56%2.66%2.69%2.89%2.51%2.04%2.92%2.44%2.45%1.59%1.50%1.92%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.62%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIQ and SPHD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDIQ has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to SPHD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIQ dropped -52.86% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 10-year performance, FDIQ leads with 7.60% vs 7.08% for SPHD. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDIQ has performed better with a 7.60% return vs 7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FDIQ.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 2.56% for FDIQ.

FDIQ is categorized as Financials Equities, while SPHD is Dividend. FDIQ tracks Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FDIQ and 0.30% for SPHD.

FDIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIQ and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer