FDIG vs. BLOK
FDIG (Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF) and BLOK (Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIG is a Blockchain fund tracking the Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments Index, while BLOK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Amplify. FDIG is passively managed, while BLOK is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDIG returned 40.44%/yr vs 51.34%/yr for BLOK. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDIG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for BLOK.
Performance
FDIG vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIG achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly higher than BLOK's 16.21% return.
FDIG
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- 10.27%
- YTD
- 19.73%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 50.23%
- 3Y*
- 40.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOK
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 30.79%
- 3Y*
- 51.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- —
FDIG vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIG Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF | 19.73% | 19.92% | 18.41% | 166.00% | -56.18% |
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 16.21% | 32.64% | 53.12% | 99.62% | -47.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIG and BLOK is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2022 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FDIG and BLOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDIG vs. BLOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDIG
BLOK
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FDIG
BLOK
Technology
FDIG
BLOK
Industrials
FDIG
BLOK
Communication Services
FDIG
BLOK
Utilities
FDIG
BLOK
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDIG
BLOK
Basic Materials
FDIG
-
BLOK
-
Consumer Defensive
FDIG
-
BLOK
-
Energy
FDIG
-
BLOK
-
Healthcare
FDIG
-
BLOK
-
Real Estate
FDIG
-
BLOK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIG vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank
FDIG
BLOK
FDIG vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIG | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.16 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 0.87 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | 1.90 | +0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIG | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 0.81 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.48 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
FDIG vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIG drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, smaller than the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIG and BLOK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIG | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.32% | -73.33% | +15.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.69% | -35.64% | -11.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.66% | -35.64% | -14.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.70% | -10.16% | -10.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.16% | -26.08% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.11% | 16.23% | +7.88% |
Volatility
FDIG vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) has a higher volatility of 12.92% compared to Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) at 10.59%. This indicates that FDIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIG | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.92% | 10.59% | +2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.95% | 28.55% | +7.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.60% | 38.29% | +11.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.81% | 42.36% | +18.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.81% | 38.97% | +21.84% |
FDIG vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIG vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison
FDIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than BLOK's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 0.62% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
FDIG Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.17% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, FDIG and BLOK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FDIG has higher volatility (12.92%) compared to BLOK (10.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIG dropped -58.32% vs BLOK's -73.33%.
On 3-year performance, BLOK leads with 51.34% vs 40.44% for FDIG. On fees, FDIG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, BLOK has been the lower-risk option at 10.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 51.34% return vs 40.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BLOK.
FDIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.62% for BLOK.
FDIG is categorized as Blockchain, while BLOK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDIG and 0.71% for BLOK.
FDIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIG and BLOK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer