PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIG vs. BLOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIG vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIG achieves a 19.73% return, which is significantly higher than BLOK's 16.21% return.


FDIG

1D
-2.69%
1M
10.27%
YTD
19.73%
6M
6.20%
1Y
50.23%
3Y*
40.44%
5Y*
10Y*

BLOK

1D
-2.62%
1M
7.72%
YTD
16.21%
6M
7.24%
1Y
30.79%
3Y*
51.34%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIG vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FDIG
Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF
19.73%19.92%18.41%166.00%-56.18%
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
16.21%32.64%53.12%99.62%-47.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIG and BLOK is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2022

0.94

The correlation between FDIG and BLOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDIG vs. BLOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDIG
BLOK

Financial Services

56.6%
55.3%

Technology

39.5%
31.8%

Industrials

1.7%
1.0%

Communication Services

0.9%
5.2%

Utilities

0.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%
6.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Financial Services

FDIG
56.6%
BLOK
55.3%

Technology

FDIG
39.5%
BLOK
31.8%

Industrials

FDIG
1.7%
BLOK
1.0%

Communication Services

FDIG
0.9%
BLOK
5.2%

Utilities

FDIG
0.8%
BLOK

-

Consumer Cyclical

FDIG
0.5%
BLOK
6.7%

Basic Materials

FDIG

-

BLOK

-

Consumer Defensive

FDIG

-

BLOK

-

Energy

FDIG

-

BLOK

-

Healthcare

FDIG

-

BLOK

-

Real Estate

FDIG

-

BLOK
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIG vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIG
FDIG Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FDIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIG Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOK
BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIG vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDIGBLOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.16

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

0.87

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.09

1.90

+0.19

FDIG vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIG and BLOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDIGBLOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.81

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.48

-0.18

Drawdowns

FDIG vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIG drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, smaller than the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIG and BLOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDIGBLOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.32%

-73.33%

+15.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.69%

-35.64%

-11.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.66%

-35.64%

-14.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.70%

-10.16%

-10.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.16%

-26.08%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.11%

16.23%

+7.88%

Volatility

FDIG vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) has a higher volatility of 12.92% compared to Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) at 10.59%. This indicates that FDIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDIGBLOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.92%

10.59%

+2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.95%

28.55%

+7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.60%

38.29%

+11.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.81%

42.36%

+18.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.81%

38.97%

+21.84%

FDIG vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDIG vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

FDIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than BLOK's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
0.62%0.72%6.00%1.15%0.00%14.31%1.88%2.05%1.30%
FDIG
Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF
1.03%1.14%1.17%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FDIG and BLOK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDIG has higher volatility (12.92%) compared to BLOK (10.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIG dropped -58.32% vs BLOK's -73.33%.

On 3-year performance, BLOK leads with 51.34% vs 40.44% for FDIG. On fees, FDIG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, BLOK has been the lower-risk option at 10.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 51.34% return vs 40.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BLOK.

FDIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.62% for BLOK.

FDIG is categorized as Blockchain, while BLOK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FDIG and 0.71% for BLOK.

FDIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIG and BLOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer