FDIF vs. FSPTX
FDIF (Fidelity Disruptors ETF) and FSPTX (Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio) are both funds - FDIF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FSPTX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past year, FDIF returned 22.85% vs 83.50% for FSPTX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDIF charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FSPTX.
Performance
FDIF vs. FSPTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIF achieves a 10.12% return, which is significantly lower than FSPTX's 47.21% return.
FDIF
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 5.86%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSPTX
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- 23.40%
- YTD
- 47.21%
- 6M
- 44.91%
- 1Y
- 83.50%
- 3Y*
- 42.95%
- 5Y*
- 25.32%
- 10Y*
- 27.99%
FDIF vs. FSPTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIF Fidelity Disruptors ETF | 10.12% | 13.83% | 19.74% | 6.49% |
FSPTX Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio | 47.21% | 23.37% | 41.76% | 9.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIF and FSPTX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between FDIF and FSPTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIF vs. FSPTX — Risk / Return Rank
FDIF
FSPTX
FDIF vs. FSPTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) and Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio (FSPTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIF | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 4.04 | -2.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 4.66 | -2.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.62 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 6.36 | -4.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 21.78 | -15.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIF | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 4.04 | -2.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.57 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
FDIF vs. FSPTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIF drawdown since its inception was -22.63%, smaller than the maximum FSPTX drawdown of -84.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIF and FSPTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIF | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.63% | -84.37% | +61.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.80% | -13.71% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | 0.00% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -27.03% | +23.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | 4.00% | -0.09% |
Volatility
FDIF vs. FSPTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) is 4.11%, while Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio (FSPTX) has a volatility of 6.24%. This indicates that FDIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIF | FSPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 6.24% | -2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.37% | 16.66% | -3.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 21.59% | -4.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 27.36% | -8.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 26.00% | -7.41% |
FDIF vs. FSPTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIF has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPTX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIF vs. FSPTX - Dividend Comparison
FDIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than FSPTX's 7.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIF Fidelity Disruptors ETF | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.35% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSPTX Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio | 7.37% | 9.06% | 9.42% | 0.01% | 3.95% | 11.62% | 18.86% | 1.86% | 23.77% | 8.32% | 1.54% | 4.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIF and FSPTX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSPTX has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to FDIF (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIF dropped -22.63% vs FSPTX's -84.37%.
FSPTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIF and FSPTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer