FDIAX vs. FSPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A (FDIAX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX).
FDIAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. FSPSX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 1997.
Performance
FDIAX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDIAX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIAX Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A | -0.46% | 6.38% | 4.09% | 5.76% | -6.45% | -1.62% | 4.86% | 5.72% | 0.40% | 1.58% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | -1.94% | 31.98% | 3.70% | 18.31% | -14.23% | 11.45% | 8.16% | 22.03% | -13.55% | 25.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIAX achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's -1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIAX has underperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 2.01%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.65% annualized return.
FDIAX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.01%
FSPSX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 19.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDIAX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDIAX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank
FDIAX
FSPSX
FDIAX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A (FDIAX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIAX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 1.11 | +0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.09 | 1.56 | +1.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.23 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 1.54 | +1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 5.93 | +5.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIAX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.11 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.51 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.53 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.46 | +0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIAX and FSPSX is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FDIAX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
FDIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than FSPSX's 3.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIAX Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A | 3.42% | 3.63% | 2.57% | 1.90% | 1.03% | 1.09% | 2.09% | 2.14% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.55% | 1.31% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.22% | 3.15% | 3.27% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.50% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
FDIAX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIAX drawdown since its inception was -12.45%, smaller than the maximum FSPSX drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIAX and FSPSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIAX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.45% | -33.69% | +21.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.63% | -11.39% | +9.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.99% | -29.41% | +19.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.20% | -33.69% | +23.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -10.86% | +9.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -6.59% | +4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | 2.96% | -2.56% |
Volatility
FDIAX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A (FDIAX) is 0.80%, while Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that FDIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDIAX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.80% | 7.04% | -6.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.40% | 10.63% | -9.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23% | 16.79% | -14.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.73% | 15.77% | -13.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.38% | 16.47% | -14.09% |