FDGRX vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDGRX (Fidelity Growth Company Fund) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both funds - FDGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. FDGRX is actively managed, while IWM is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDGRX returned 23.44%/yr vs 11.58%/yr for IWM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDGRX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

FDGRX vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGRX achieves a 21.71% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 20.47% return. Over the past 10 years, FDGRX has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 23.44%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.58% annualized return.

FDGRX

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 21.71%
• 6M: 14.48%
• 1Y: 44.78%
• 3Y*: 30.10%
• 5Y*: 15.67%
• 10Y*: 23.44%

IWM

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 3.82%
• YTD: 20.47%
• 6M: 17.64%
• 1Y: 40.90%
• 3Y*: 19.22%
• 5Y*: 6.27%
• 10Y*: 11.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGRX vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund	21.71%	18.54%	37.18%	47.25%	-33.86%	22.57%	67.42%	38.40%	-4.14%	36.76%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	20.47%	12.66%	11.38%	16.83%	-20.48%	14.54%	20.03%	25.39%	-11.12%	14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGRX and IWM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2000	0.83

The correlation between FDGRX and IWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (3 years) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDGRX vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDGRX	IWM
Technology	53.5%	20.1%
Communication Services	14.1%	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	8.0%
Healthcare	11.3%	15.6%
Financial Services	3.0%	15.5%
Industrials	2.7%	17.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	2.0%
Basic Materials	0.6%	4.5%
Energy	0.5%	6.0%
Real Estate	0.2%	5.5%
Utilities	-	3.1%

Return for Risk

FDGRX vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGRX

FDGRX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FDGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FDGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FDGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FDGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FDGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 67
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 57
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGRX vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDGRX	IWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.08	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	2.86	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.34	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.68	3.73	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.48	13.18	+0.30

FDGRX vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGRX and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDGRX vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGRX drawdown since its inception was -71.62%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGRX and IWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDGRX	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.62%	-59.05%	-12.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.60%	-11.03%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.19%	-27.50%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.25%	-31.91%	-8.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.25%	-41.13%	+0.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.66%	-0.96%	-0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.89%	-10.75%	-5.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	3.11%	+0.31%

Volatility

FDGRX vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 6.56%. This indicates that FDGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDGRX	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.45%	6.56%	+0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.85%	14.31%	+1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.60%	19.74%	-0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.11%	22.61%	+1.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.48%	23.06%	+0.42%

FDGRX vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGRX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDGRX vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDGRX Fidelity Growth Company Fund	0.00%	0.00%	8.86%	3.83%	7.20%	10.67%	8.86%	3.84%	6.38%	4.73%	6.16%	3.92%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.90%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDGRX and IWM in my portfolio?

FDGRX and IWM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDGRX or IWM?

FDGRX has higher volatility (7.45%) compared to IWM (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGRX dropped -71.62% vs IWM's -59.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.