PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDGRX vs. FOKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDGRX vs. FOKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGRX achieves a 23.69% return, which is significantly lower than FOKFX's 26.86% return.


FDGRX

1D
0.75%
1M
9.19%
YTD
23.69%
6M
19.33%
1Y
49.90%
3Y*
31.65%
5Y*
17.30%
10Y*
23.01%

FOKFX

1D
0.91%
1M
10.94%
YTD
26.86%
6M
25.59%
1Y
58.38%
3Y*
32.48%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGRX vs. FOKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FDGRX
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
23.69%18.54%37.18%47.25%-33.86%22.57%67.42%15.48%
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
26.86%20.30%34.58%43.48%-32.32%25.95%47.52%17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGRX and FOKFX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019

0.97

The correlation between FDGRX and FOKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDGRX vs. FOKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGRX
FDGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FDGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FOKFX
FOKFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FOKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FOKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGRX vs. FOKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDGRXFOKFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.81

3.25

-0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.42

4.05

-0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.54

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

4.73

-0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.39

19.68

-4.29

FDGRX vs. FOKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the FOKFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGRX and FOKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDGRXFOKFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

3.25

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.79

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.96

-0.26

Drawdowns

FDGRX vs. FOKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGRX drawdown since its inception was -71.62%, which is greater than FOKFX's maximum drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGRX and FOKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGRXFOKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.62%

-37.26%

-34.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.60%

-12.53%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.19%

-24.81%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.25%

-37.26%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.91%

-9.20%

-6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.01%

+0.33%

Volatility

FDGRX vs. FOKFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) is 4.40%, while Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that FDGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGRXFOKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

5.61%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.43%

14.55%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.47%

18.47%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.93%

23.01%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.39%

24.64%

-1.25%

FDGRX vs. FOKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGRX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FOKFX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDGRX vs. FOKFX - Dividend Comparison

FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FOKFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDGRX
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
0.00%0.00%8.86%3.83%7.20%10.67%8.86%3.84%6.38%4.73%6.16%3.92%
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
3.31%4.20%4.58%0.24%0.08%3.81%0.39%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FDGRX and FOKFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOKFX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to FDGRX (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGRX dropped -71.62% vs FOKFX's -37.26%.

FOKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDGRX and FOKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer