PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDGDX vs. SVAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDGDX vs. SVAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D (FDGDX) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGDX achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly higher than SVAAX's 8.72% return.


FDGDX

1D
1.75%
1M
3.22%
YTD
18.15%
6M
17.89%
1Y
38.87%
3Y*
25.70%
5Y*
15.75%
10Y*

SVAAX

1D
-0.58%
1M
-2.44%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.72%
1Y
19.67%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
7.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGDX vs. SVAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDGDX
Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D
18.15%21.56%26.30%16.72%-12.54%27.06%1.32%27.67%-7.58%17.77%
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
8.72%14.42%16.29%-2.07%8.07%21.36%-8.15%19.42%-8.44%14.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGDX and SVAAX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between FDGDX and SVAAX has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDGDX vs. SVAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGDX
FDGDX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FDGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SVAAX
SVAAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SVAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SVAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGDX vs. SVAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D (FDGDX) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDGDXSVAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.39

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

5.22

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.04

13.86

+4.18

FDGDX vs. SVAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the SVAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGDX and SVAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDGDX vs. SVAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGDX drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum SVAAX drawdown of -51.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGDX and SVAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGDXSVAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.44%

-51.16%

+12.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-4.71%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.70%

-12.84%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.70%

-16.17%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.41%

+3.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-8.19%

+2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

1.71%

+0.60%

Volatility

FDGDX vs. SVAAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D (FDGDX) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) at 3.93%. This indicates that FDGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGDXSVAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

3.93%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.12%

7.84%

+4.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

10.66%

+4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

13.70%

+3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.44%

15.42%

+4.02%

Dividends

FDGDX vs. SVAAX - Dividend Comparison

FDGDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SVAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDGDX
Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
5.88%5.80%7.38%4.10%9.49%3.50%4.06%8.55%8.39%10.16%5.00%8.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDGDX and SVAAX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDGDX has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to SVAAX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGDX dropped -38.44% vs SVAAX's -51.16%.

FDGDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDGDX and SVAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer