FDGDX vs. SVAAX
FDGDX (Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D) and SVAAX (Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A) are both Dividend funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDGDX returned 15.75%/yr vs 10.49%/yr for SVAAX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FDGDX vs. SVAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDGDX achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly higher than SVAAX's 8.72% return.
FDGDX
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- 18.15%
- 6M
- 17.89%
- 1Y
- 38.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.70%
- 5Y*
- 15.75%
- 10Y*
- —
SVAAX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 19.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 7.76%
FDGDX vs. SVAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGDX Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D | 18.15% | 21.56% | 26.30% | 16.72% | -12.54% | 27.06% | 1.32% | 27.67% | -7.58% | 17.77% |
SVAAX Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A | 8.72% | 14.42% | 16.29% | -2.07% | 8.07% | 21.36% | -8.15% | 19.42% | -8.44% | 14.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDGDX and SVAAX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDGDX and SVAAX has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDGDX vs. SVAAX — Risk / Return Rank
FDGDX
SVAAX
FDGDX vs. SVAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D (FDGDX) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDGDX | SVAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.39 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.26 | 5.22 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.04 | 13.86 | +4.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDGDX vs. SVAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDGDX drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum SVAAX drawdown of -51.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGDX and SVAAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDGDX | SVAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.44% | -51.16% | +12.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -4.71% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.70% | -12.84% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.70% | -16.17% | -5.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.41% | +3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -8.19% | +2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 1.71% | +0.60% |
Volatility
FDGDX vs. SVAAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D (FDGDX) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) at 3.93%. This indicates that FDGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDGDX | SVAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 3.93% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | 7.84% | +4.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | 10.66% | +4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 13.70% | +3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 15.42% | +4.02% |
Dividends
FDGDX vs. SVAAX - Dividend Comparison
FDGDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SVAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGDX Fidelity Advisor 529 Dividend Growth Portfolio Class D | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SVAAX Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A | 5.88% | 5.80% | 7.38% | 4.10% | 9.49% | 3.50% | 4.06% | 8.55% | 8.39% | 10.16% | 5.00% | 8.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDGDX and SVAAX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDGDX has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to SVAAX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGDX dropped -38.44% vs SVAAX's -51.16%.
FDGDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDGDX and SVAAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer