FDG vs. SPIT
FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FDG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.
Performance
FDG vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDG achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 24.45% return.
FDG
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 14.28%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.05%
SPIT
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -5.03%
- 6M
- 16.23%
- YTD
- 24.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.83M | $1.61M | $2.38M | |
| $242.68K | $282.09K | $201.11K |
FDG vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.10% | 4.22% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 24.45% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDG and SPIT is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDG vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank
FDG
SPIT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDG vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDG | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.06 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDG vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDG drawdown since its inception was -43.69%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDG and SPIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDG | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.69% | -12.49% | -31.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.82% | -7.55% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.27% | -2.85% | -10.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.45% | — | — |
Volatility
FDG vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDG | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.59% | 26.59% | -6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.09% | 26.59% | -1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 26.59% | -1.60% |
FDG vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDG vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison
FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 5.77% | 7.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDG and SPIT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.
SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDG and 0.89% for SPIT.
Find the right allocation for FDG and SPIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer