FDG vs. QGRO
Compare and contrast key facts about American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO).
FDG and QGRO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDG is an actively managed fund by American Century. It was launched on Mar 31, 2020. QGRO is a passively managed fund by American Century that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR). It was launched on Sep 10, 2018.
Performance
FDG vs. QGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDG vs. QGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | -10.09% | 22.13% | 45.89% | 37.22% | -35.74% | 8.52% | 93.61% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | -8.26% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 24.57% | 72.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDG achieves a -10.09% return, which is significantly lower than QGRO's -8.26% return.
FDG
- 1D
- 4.35%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- YTD
- -10.09%
- 6M
- -5.30%
- 1Y
- 25.52%
- 3Y*
- 24.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.73%
- 10Y*
- —
QGRO
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -8.26%
- 6M
- -8.10%
- 1Y
- 12.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDG vs. QGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRO's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDG vs. QGRO — Risk / Return Rank
FDG
QGRO
FDG vs. QGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDG | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 0.57 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 0.97 | +0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.13 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 0.93 | +0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 3.20 | +2.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDG | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.57 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.49 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.61 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDG and QGRO is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDG vs. QGRO - Dividend Comparison
FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.21% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
FDG vs. QGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDG drawdown since its inception was -43.69%, which is greater than QGRO's maximum drawdown of -32.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDG and QGRO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDG | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.69% | -32.56% | -11.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.71% | -13.54% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.69% | -31.86% | -11.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.04% | -10.52% | -1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.75% | -7.76% | -5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 3.95% | +0.50% |
Volatility
FDG vs. QGRO - Volatility Comparison
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) at 6.57%. This indicates that FDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDG | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.98% | 6.57% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 12.35% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.85% | 21.66% | +2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 21.13% | +3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.05% | 23.10% | +1.95% |