FDG vs. GARY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FDG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.

Performance

FDG vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDG achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 25.69% return.

FDG

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -3.88%
• 6M: 0.24%
• YTD: 0.10%
• 1Y: 14.28%
• 3Y*: 22.99%
• 5Y*: 8.96%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.05%

GARY

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: -4.25%
• 6M: 15.73%
• YTD: 25.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	$1.83M	$1.61M	$2.38M
GARY Mango Growth ETF	$600.48K	$395.06K	$299.75K

FDG vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	0.10%	0.68%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	25.69%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FDG and GARY is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025	0.76

Return for Risk

FDG vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDG

FDG Risk / Return Rank: 24
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 26

GARY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDG vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDG	GARY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.55	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.06	—	—

Drawdowns

FDG vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDG drawdown since its inception was -43.69%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -12.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDG and GARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDG	GARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.69%	-12.67%	-31.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.82%	-8.40%	-1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-2.40%	-10.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.45%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDG	GARY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.13%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.59%	22.34%	-1.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.09%	22.34%	+2.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.99%	22.34%	+2.65%

FDG vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDG vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDG and GARY in my portfolio?

FDG and GARY have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FDG or GARY?

On fees, FDG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDG or GARY?

FDG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDG or GARY?

GARY has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.

What is the main difference between FDG and GARY?

They also come from different issuers: American Century and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDG and 0.77% for GARY.