FDFAX vs. RSPS
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio (FDFAX) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS).
FDFAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 28, 1985. RSPS is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006.
Performance
FDFAX vs. RSPS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDFAX vs. RSPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFAX Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio | 5.95% | -1.31% | -0.14% | 3.02% | -0.44% | 14.43% | 11.60% | 31.79% | -15.91% | 12.15% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.40% | -0.88% | -1.47% | -5.39% | 2.88% | 14.68% | 6.19% | 28.17% | -10.86% | 14.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDFAX achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly higher than RSPS's 2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FDFAX has outperformed RSPS with an annualized return of 5.17%, while RSPS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.26% annualized return.
FDFAX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 6M
- 8.03%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 1.86%
- 5Y*
- 3.46%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
RSPS
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -10.53%
- YTD
- 2.40%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- -1.52%
- 3Y*
- -2.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDFAX vs. RSPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDFAX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDFAX vs. RSPS — Risk / Return Rank
FDFAX
RSPS
FDFAX vs. RSPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio (FDFAX) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDFAX | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.35 | -0.10 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.62 | -0.04 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.99 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | -0.03 | +0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.03 | -0.07 | +1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDFAX | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | -0.10 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.10 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.29 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.57 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDFAX and RSPS is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDFAX vs. RSPS - Dividend Comparison
FDFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than RSPS's 2.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFAX Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio | 6.08% | 6.45% | 2.73% | 5.13% | 3.34% | 10.73% | 3.16% | 2.78% | 14.36% | 8.82% | 4.71% | 9.06% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.84% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
Drawdowns
FDFAX vs. RSPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDFAX drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, which is greater than RSPS's maximum drawdown of -35.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFAX and RSPS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDFAX | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.29% | -35.93% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -11.72% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.78% | -18.61% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.66% | -25.42% | -2.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.07% | -10.60% | +2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -5.00% | -0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 4.53% | -0.14% |
Volatility
FDFAX vs. RSPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Portfolio (FDFAX) is 3.77%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that FDFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDFAX | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 4.02% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.22% | 10.11% | -0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.74% | 14.76% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 13.52% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 14.84% | +0.12% |