PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEV vs. KEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FDEV vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FDEV vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FDEV
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
3.83%30.36%5.84%13.37%-16.54%11.00%5.49%8.05%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
9.35%38.28%0.36%20.57%-19.35%10.55%12.84%7.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEV achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 9.35% return.


FDEV

1D
2.35%
1M
-4.83%
YTD
3.83%
6M
9.22%
1Y
25.14%
3Y*
14.97%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*

KEMX

1D
4.34%
1M
-11.07%
YTD
9.35%
6M
21.09%
1Y
50.32%
3Y*
20.32%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDEV vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FDEV vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEV
FDEV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEV vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDEVKEMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

2.36

-0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

3.00

-0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.44

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.25

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.64

13.60

-1.96

FDEV vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEV and KEMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDEVKEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.36

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.52

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.50

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between FDEV and KEMX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FDEV vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

FDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than KEMX's 3.00% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
FDEV
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
2.83%2.86%2.99%2.80%2.65%2.81%1.88%2.73%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
3.00%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%

Drawdowns

FDEV vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEV drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEV and KEMX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FDEVKEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-38.80%

+8.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-15.36%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

-30.85%

+1.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.83%

-11.68%

+6.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.38%

-9.02%

+2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

3.67%

-1.54%

Volatility

FDEV vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) is 6.22%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 12.58%. This indicates that FDEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FDEVKEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

12.58%

-6.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

16.96%

-7.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

21.39%

-6.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

17.55%

-3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.38%

20.61%

-5.23%