PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDEQX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDEQX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disciplined Equity Fund (FDEQX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEQX achieves a 12.17% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FDEQX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 14.98%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.78% annualized return.


FDEQX

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
12.17%
6M
10.52%
1Y
24.25%
3Y*
22.76%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
14.98%

SCHG

1D
-1.09%
1M
-5.54%
YTD
0.23%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
14.41%
3Y*
22.19%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
18.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEQX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDEQX
Fidelity Disciplined Equity Fund
12.17%16.43%25.01%34.07%-28.06%27.62%29.80%31.95%-10.37%20.15%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.23%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEQX and SCHG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.96

The correlation between FDEQX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDEQX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEQX
FDEQX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FDEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEQX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disciplined Equity Fund (FDEQX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDEQXSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.16

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

0.88

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

2.86

+5.45

FDEQX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEQX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDEQX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEQX drawdown since its inception was -55.27%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEQX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDEQXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.27%

-34.59%

-20.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-16.41%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.31%

-23.39%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.91%

-34.59%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.91%

-34.59%

+1.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-7.50%

+4.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-5.20%

-4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

5.05%

-2.09%

Volatility

FDEQX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Disciplined Equity Fund (FDEQX) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.91%. This indicates that FDEQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDEQXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

5.91%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.95%

12.49%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.13%

16.18%

+0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.26%

22.39%

-2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.10%

21.58%

-1.48%

FDEQX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEQX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDEQX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

FDEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, more than SCHG's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDEQX
Fidelity Disciplined Equity Fund
7.18%8.06%9.23%4.55%2.89%1.43%0.02%0.54%15.29%2.89%1.46%5.20%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.40%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FDEQX and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDEQX has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to SCHG (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEQX dropped -55.27% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

FDEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDEQX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer