FDEM vs. TJUN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDEM (Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF) and TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - FDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDEM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TJUN.

Performance

FDEM vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDEM achieves a 22.58% return, which is significantly higher than TJUN's 5.26% return.

FDEM

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 7.69%
• YTD: 22.58%
• 6M: 24.26%
• 1Y: 45.52%
• 3Y*: 23.79%
• 5Y*: 9.43%
• 10Y*: —

TJUN

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 5.26%
• 6M: 6.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEM vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF	22.58%	15.72%
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June	5.26%	11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEM and TJUN is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.83

Return for Risk

FDEM vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEM

FDEM Risk / Return Rank: 76
FDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEM vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDEM	TJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.12	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDEM	TJUN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	2.48	-1.96

Drawdowns

FDEM vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEM drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEM and TJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDEM	TJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.65%	-4.47%	-29.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-0.00%	-1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.84%	-0.60%	-8.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDEM	TJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.36%	7.54%	+9.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.13%	7.54%	+8.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.91%	7.54%	+10.37%

FDEM vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDEM vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison

FDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF	2.66%	3.23%	4.05%	4.41%	3.95%	2.71%	1.84%	2.39%
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDEM and TJUN in my portfolio?

FDEM and TJUN have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FDEM or TJUN?

On fees, FDEM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDEM or TJUN?

FDEM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDEM or TJUN?

FDEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.

What is the main difference between FDEM and TJUN?

FDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDEM and 0.95% for TJUN.